Investigator

Akira Kikuchi

Niigata Cancer Center Hospital

AKAkira Kikuchi
Papers(2)
Trends in endometrial…A retrospective study…
Collaborators(6)
Kotaro TakahashiMasayuki YamaguchiNobumichi NishikawaRyo TamuraTakashi KawasakiYohei Kitani
Institutions(2)
Niigata Cancer Center…Niigata University

Papers

Trends in endometrial carcinoma: experience of a single institute for four decades

Abstract Objective To determine the current prognosis of endometrial carcinoma in Japan by analyzing long-term trends in endometrial carcinoma at our hospital. Methods We divided 1463 patients with endometrial carcinoma who visited our hospital between 1984 and 2022 into group 1984–1991, group 1992–1999, group 2000–2006, group 2007–2014 and group 2015–2022. Trends were determined using the Jonckheere–Terpstra and Cochran–Armitage tests. Data were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. Results When group 2015–2022 was used as a reference in the univariate analysis, the hazard ratios for the other groups were <1. In particular, the hazard ratio for group 2007–2014 was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.90, P = 0.009), suggesting that the prognosis of group 2015–2022 was worse than that of group 2007–2014 and seemed to be the worst among all prognoses. In multivariate analysis, the hazard ratios for each group were 1.38, 1.42, 1.88, 1.16 and 1, respectively; the group with the worst prognosis changed from group 2015–2022 to group 2000–2006 (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27–2.78, P = 0.001). Age and the rate of non-endometrioid carcinoma exhibited significantly increasing trends (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), as did the rates of serous and mixed carcinomas (P = 0.001 and 0.024, respectively). The rates of non-endometrioid carcinoma, serous carcinoma and mixed carcinoma were 19.0%, 5.5% and 3.1% in group 2007–2014 and 28.2%, 10.8% and 4.6% in group 2015–2022, respectively. Conclusions The increasing rates of non-endometrioid carcinoma—especially serous and mixed carcinoma—may be associated with the worsening prognosis of endometrial carcinoma at our institution. Careful monitoring is needed to confirm whether this phenomenon is observed throughout Japan.

A retrospective study of Pipelle endometrial biopsy for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers

Although the Pipelle endometrial biopsy is widely performed as a practical and minimally invasive test for endometrial disease(s), its effectiveness in ovarian cancer has not been explored. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the results of Pipelle endometrial biopsy for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers. A pre-treatment Pipelle-endometrial biopsy was performed in 90 patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancers between January 2014 and November 2021. We retrospectively analysed the association between the results of Pipelle endometrial biopsy and clinicopathological data. Moreover, we evaluated their impact on the following treatment in advanced cases initially treated with chemotherapy. The sensitivity and false-negative rates for Pipelle endometrial biopsy were 25/90 (27.8%) and 65/90 (72.2%) in all patients, respectively, and 23/56 (41.0%) and 33/56 (58.9%) in cases with advanced disease (stages III and IV), respectively. Pipelle-positive endometrial biopsy-positive (Pipelle-positive) was not observed in 29 patients with clinical stage I disease, and Pipelle-positive patients exhibited significantly more high-grade serous carcinomas, and positive peritoneal, endometrial, and cervical cytologies than Pipelle-endometrial biopsy-negative cases. Surgical pathology was confirmed in 23 Pipelle-positive patients, and 17/23 (74.0%) had the same diagnosis as that for Pipelle endometrial biopsy. Conversely, 6/23 (26.0%) patients exhibited a minor diagnostic discrepancy between Pipelle endometrial biopsy and surgical pathology. Nineteen of the 38 (50.0%) patients initially treated with chemotherapy were identified as Pipelle-positive, contributing to a prompt histological diagnosis and pre-treatment tumour sampling. Companion diagnostic tests were performed using Pipelle endometrial biopsy samples from 4 inoperable patients. Although the positive rate of Pipelle endometrial biopsy in ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers is low, Pipelle endometrial biopsy may enable prompt histological diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy while collecting tumour tissue for genetic testing in some cases with advanced disease.

3Works
2Papers
6Collaborators