Akiko Yamamoto

Ovarian Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma Recurring With a Rhabdomyosarcoma Component: A Case Report

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) has recently been described as a tumor of the endometrium or ovaries, which, morphologically and immunohistochemically, resembles mesonephric adenocarcinoma arising mostly in the uterine cervix. Herein, we report, to our knowledge, the first case of ovarian MLA that developed into an extremely rapidly growing recurrent mesonephric-like carcinosarcoma, as confirmed by a genomic profiling test. A 51-year-old woman underwent chemotherapy with complete debulking surgery for ovarian carcinoma. Pathologically, the patient was diagnosed with stage IVB ovarian MLA. Subsequent to 15 months of complete remission, an enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a solid tumor of 10 cm diameter in the abdominal cavity. Secondary surgery was terminated with a 2 cm2 tumor biopsy specimen collection considering perioperative complications. Histologically, the tumor consisted of short spindle cells, and immunohistochemical staining revealed a rhabdomyosarcomatous profile without an epithelial component. Despite treatment for the sarcoma, she died 3 months after the detection of the tumor. The genomic profiling of the primary ovarian carcinoma and secondary resected tumor biopsy specimens revealed an identical KRAS mutation in both. Therefore, we concluded that the ovarian MLA recurred with a rhabdomyosarcoma component.

Retrospective comparative study of robot‐assisted surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and laparotomy for endometrial cancer in patients with a low risk of recurrence

AbstractAimMinimally invasive surgeries for endometrial cancer are increasing worldwide. In Japan, some articles have examined surgical outcomes, but only a few have addressed oncological outcomes. This study aims to compare robot surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and laparotomy in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes within a low‐risk group for endometrial cancer recurrence.MethodsThis study included patients with endometrial cancer deemed to be at low risk of recurrence and who underwent surgery between January 2011 and December 2020. We studied 99 patients who underwent robot surgery, 85 patients who underwent laparotomy, and 77 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared retrospectively for these groups of patients.ResultsThe median follow‐up period was 47, 61, and 60 months in the laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic groups, respectively. The three groups had similar perioperative and pathological data. No significant differences in overall survival and disease‐free survival were observed among the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses conducted on the overall study population for disease‐free survival and overall survival showed that the surgical approach did not have any influence. Minimally invasive surgery groups had longer operating times compared to the laparotomy group, but they had significantly less blood loss. The number of resected pelvic lymph nodes was similar, and the complication rate was not significant.ConclusionsRobot‐assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery were found to be less invasive and showed similar oncologic outcomes compared to laparotomy surgery for endometrial cancer in patients with a low risk of recurrence.