Investigator
University of Tokyo, Department of Pathology
PLK1 or WEE1 inhibition targets homologous recombination repair proficiency in BRCA1/2 wild-type high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Abstract High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is a poor prognostic disease, especially in BRCA1 / 2 wild-type (BRCA-WT) patients with homologous recombination (HR) proficiency. These patients often show limited response to both platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. HR and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) are the two major DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. HR is a precise repair mechanism for DSBs but is limited to S and G2 phases. In contrast, NHEJ functions more broadly throughout the cell cycle, including G1. We investigated whether inhibiting the G2/M checkpoint kinases PLK1 or WEE1 individually could disrupt mitotic control and expose therapeutic vulnerabilities in BRCA-WT/HR-proficient HGSOC cells. We evaluated cell cycle–targeted strategies to overcome HR-proficient chemoresistance using either volasertib (a selective PLK1 inhibitor) or adavosertib (a potent WEE1 inhibitor) in BRCA-WT/HR-proficient and BRCA-mutant/HR-deficient HGSOC models. Both agents induced DNA damage, impaired HR repair (reduced RAD51 foci), and triggered mitotic catastrophe—a form of cell death caused by defective mitosis and unresolved DNA damage—in BRCA-WT cells. Volasertib caused polyploidy and abnormal spindle formation, indicating mitotic slippage and cytokinesis failure, whereas adavosertib abrogated the G2/M checkpoint, forcing premature mitotic entry. In contrast, BRCA-mutant cells were resistant to either volasertib or adavosertib, consistent with sustained and functional NHEJ activity. This resistance was restored by the pharmacological or genetic inhibition of DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit), a prominent component of NHEJ. Functional and xenograft models confirmed selective vulnerability of BRCA-WT tumors to either PLK1 or WEE1 inhibition. Our work highlights a mechanistic framework linking cell cycle checkpoint inhibition to DNA repair pathway selectivity, providing a rationale for targeting mitotic regulators in HR-proficient ovarian cancer—a subgroup with high clinical unmet need.
Cyclin E1 overexpression sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to WEE1 and PLK1 inhibition
Abstract Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) amplification is associated with poor prognosis of ovarian carcinomas across histological subtypes. Inhibitors targeting PLK1 or WEE1 are emerging as promising therapeutic agents for cancer treatment that disrupt the critical G2/M checkpoint, leading to cancer cell death. However, biomarkers that predict the response to these inhibitors are not well defined. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the PLK1 inhibitor, volasertib, and the WEE1 inhibitor, adavosertib, along with the biomarker potential of cyclin E1 in ovarian cancer cells. Both inhibitors suppressed the proliferation of cyclin E1-overexpressing cells to a greater extent than that of cells exhibiting low cyclin E1 expression. TP53 silencing did not increase the sensitivity to these inhibitors. In cyclin E1-overexpressing cells, PLK1 inhibition reduced the proportion of cells in the G1 phase and increased those in the G2/M and sub-G1 phases. WEE1 inhibition reduced G1 phase cells without a clear peak in the S-G2/M phase and increased the sub-G1 phase cells. Both inhibitors suppressed the growth of cyclin E1-overexpressing tumors in vivo. Taken together, cyclin E1 overexpression, regardless of TP53 status, may serve as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of these inhibitors, offering potential personalized treatment strategies for ovarian cancer.
Researcher
University of Tokyo · Department of Pathology
JP