Aikou Okamoto

Long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy evaluated using patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic malignancies

Bevacizumab in frontline chemotherapy improved the survival outcome for advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with poor outcomes owing to chemoresistance. Bevacizumab (Bev) is increasingly being used to treat advanced ovarian cancer; however, its efficacy in OCCC remains unclear. This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of frontline bevacizumab chemotherapy in patients with OCCC. This retrospective multi-institutional study included patients diagnosed with advanced OCCC at eight institutions in Japan between 2008 and 2018. Patients were categorized into pre and post-market groups based on the Bev approval dates. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Additionally, patients were classified into Bev-treated (Bev+) and non-Bev-treated (Bev-) groups, and their prognoses were compared. A total of 96 patients were in the pre-market group and 82 in the post-market group. The post-market group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with poor performance status and patients who underwent interval debulking surgery (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis demonstrated a better PFS in the post-market group (p=0.041). In multivariate analysis, better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.52; p=0.002) and OS (HR=0.47; p=0.002) were observed in the post-market group than in the pre-market group. Bev+ patients had significantly better PFS and OS than Bev- patients in univariate (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) and multivariate analyses (PFS: HR=0.36; p<0.001 and OS: HR=0.21; p=0.001, respectively). Incorporating Bev into frontline chemotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with advanced OCCC.

A phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of repeated high dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy for patients with recurrent early-stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG2051/KGOG2031, REMPA trial)

Fertility preserving therapy using medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is an important option for young patients with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). However, the effectiveness and feasibility of repeated MPA therapy for patients with intrauterine recurrence following initial MPA therapy is controversial. Only a few single-institution retrospective studies have been conducted on repeated MPA therapy, therefore, multicenter prospective studies for repeated MPA therapy are highly needed. The aim of this study is to assess whether repeated MPA therapy is effective and feasible for patients with intrauterine recurrence following initial MPA therapy. This is a prospective, single-arm, a multicenter phase II trial on repeated MPA therapy for intrauterine recurrence following fertility-preserving therapy for AEH or stage IA (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2008) non-myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma grade 1. Patients are treated with oral MPA (500-600 mg/day). Pathologically assessment via dilation and curettage will be performed every 2 months until complete response. The major inclusion criteria are 1) intrauterine recurrence of AEH or stage IA (FIGO 2008) endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 without myometrial invasion or extrauterine spread confirmed by imaging tests after complete remission with the previous MPA therapy. 2) The number of recurrences should be up to twice. 3) histologically diagnosed as AEH or endometrioid carcinoma grade 1, 4) 20-42 years of age, and 5) strong desire and consent for fertility-sparing treatment. The primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival rate. A total of 115 patients will be enrolled from multiple institutions in Japan and Korea within 4 years and followed up for 2 years. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs031200256.

A retrospective study of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

This study compared the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (ddTC+Bev) with ddTC for advanced ovarian cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 134 patients who received ddTC+Bev or ddTC as first-line chemotherapy for stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Progression-free survival as primary endpoint of this study was compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to analyze prognostic factors, and the frequency of adverse events was examined using the χ² test. We categorized 134 patients in the ddTC+Bev (n=57) and ddTC (n=77) groups who started treatment at four related institutions from November 2013 to December 2017. No patients used poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as the first line maintenance therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the ddTC+Bev group had a significantly better prognosis than that of the ddTC group (hazard ratio [HR]=0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-0.79; p<0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that ddTC+Bev regimen was a prognostic factor. However, intergroup comparison using PSM revealed that the PFS of the ddTC+Bev group had a nonsignificantly better prognosis than that of the ddTC group (HR=0.70; 95% CI=0.41-1.20; p=0.189). Few adverse events above G3 were noted for ddTC+Bev, which were sufficiently tolerable. This study could not demonstrate that adding Bev to ddTC improves prognosis. Further studies with more cases are warranted.

Short- and long-term morbidity of total parietal peritonectomy for advanced ovarian cancer

Total parietal peritonectomy is gradually being recognized as a surgical option for advanced ovarian cancer; however, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety remains insufficient. Herein, we aimed to assess the short- and long-term post-operative safety profiles of total parietal peritonectomy. We reviewed the medical records of post-operative morbidity and mortality of patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery with total parietal peritonectomy for stage III and IV ovarian cancer between April 2018 and January 2023. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study: 31 who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and 19 who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery. The median age of all patients was 57 (range, 23-74) years. The median follow-up period was 22 (range, 3-59) months. Of 44 patients (88%) with stage IIIC/IV, 38 patients (76%) had high-grade serous carcinoma. The complete resection rates were 94%, 91%, and 100% in all patients, the primary cytoreductive surgery group, and the interval cytoreductive surgery group, respectively. There were 63 post-operative complication events overall, including 17 (27%) major complication events in 15 patients within 1 year post-operatively. Ten major complications occurred within 30 days of surgery, mainly in the primary cytoreductive surgery group (9 cases). Regarding complication type, the most frequent major event was pleural effusion (3 cases, 7%). After 30 days, there were a total of 17 all-grade complication events, of which ileus and hydronephrosis were major complications in 3 cases each (18%). There were no mortalities related to cytoreductive surgery. The scheduled adjuvant chemotherapy could be completed in 96% of patients. Total parietal peritonectomy is a feasible procedure for managing advanced ovarian cancer. Short- and long-term complications may include pleural effusion and ileus/hydronephrosis, respectively.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer (ACE) trial: A randomized phase II study for advanced endometrial carcinoma

AbstractThis study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of three postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for endometrial cancer. Endometrioid cancer patients with intermediate‐risk stage I and II or high‐risk stage III and IV disease were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either paclitaxel‐epirubicin‐carboplatin (TEC), paclitaxel‐anthracycline (doxorubicin)‐carboplatin (TAC), or dose‐dense paclitaxel‐carboplatin (ddTC). The primary end‐point was the completion rate (CRate) of six cycles of treatment. The secondary end‐points were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred and one patients were treated as follows: 33 received TEC, 33 TAC, and 35 ddTC. The CRates for TEC, TAC, and ddTC were 94%, 64%, and 69%, respectively (P = .005). The TEC CRate was significantly higher than for the other two groups. However, the PFS and OS outcomes were not statistically different between the three groups. The 2‐year survival rates were 94%, 97%, and 97% for TEC, TAC, and ddTC, respectively. When compared to the current standard treatments for endometrial cancer, TEC is a promising candidate for a phase III trial based on its significantly superior CRate and equivalent PFS and OS. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000008911).

Current treatment strategies for ovarian cancer in the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT)

Ovarian cancer, notable for its severe prognosis among gynecologic cancers, has seen substantial progress in treatment approaches recently. Enhanced protocols in chemotherapy and the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for maintenance therapy have markedly improved outcomes for patients with specific genetic profiles, such as those positive for BRCA mutations or exhibiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Additionally, the method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration has emerged as a valuable alternative to traditional transvenous routes, showing promise for wider clinical adoption. The field of surgery has also evolved, with increasing exploration into the benefits and feasibility of laparoscopic methods over more invasive traditional surgeries, aiming for complete tumor removal but with reduced patient impact. The hereditary nature of ovarian cancer underscores the importance of genetic testing, which has become integral in tailoring treatment strategies, particularly in determining suitability for PARP inhibitors. The formation of the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) aims to optimize treatment across Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan. The ovarian cancer committee of EAGOT shared the current policies, focusing on 5 topics: 1) strategies for maintenance therapy after initial surgery and chemotherapy, 2) drug regimens for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence, 3) intraperitoneal chemotherapy, 4) laparoscopic surgery as an alternative to laparotomy, and 5) current status of genetic testing (BRCA, HRD, and panel tests) for ovarian cancer and its prospects. EAGOT's multi-national trials aim to harmonize these evolving treatment strategies, ensuring that the latest and most effective protocols are accessible across the region, thereby significantly impacting patient outcomes in East Asia.

An attempt to establish real-world databases of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group

The development of new treatments for gynecological malignancies has been conducted mainly through collaborative international phase III trials led by the United States and Europe. The survival outcomes of many gynecological malignancies have greatly improved as a result. Recent large-scale genome-wide association studies have revealed that drug efficacy and adverse event profiles are not always uniform. Thus, it is important to validate new treatment options in each country to safely and efficiently provide newly developed treatment options to patients with gynecological malignancies. The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) is conducting 5 cohort studies (JGOG 3026, 3027, 3028, 3030, and 3031) to establish real-world data (RWD) of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor use in patients with advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. The RWD constructed will be used to provide newly developed PARP inhibitors for women with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer in a safer and more efficient manner as well as to develop further treatment options. In 2022, The JGOG, Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group, Chinese Gynecologic Cancer Society, and Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group established the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group to collaborate with East Asian countries in clinical research on gynecologic malignancies and disseminate new knowledge on gynecologic malignancies from Asia. The JGOG will conduct a collaborative integrated analysis of the RWD generated from Asian countries and disseminate real-world clinical knowledge regarding new treatment options that have been clinically implemented.

Current status of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer practice among gynecologic oncologists in Japan: a nationwide survey by the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO)

The practices pertaining to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in Japan have been rapidly changing owing to the clinical development of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, the increasing availability of companion diagnostics, and the broadened insurance coverage of HBOC management from April 2020. A questionnaire of gynecologic oncologists was conducted to understand the current status and to promote the widespread standardization of future HBOC management. A Google Form questionnaire was administered to the members of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology. The survey consisted of 25 questions in 4 categories: respondent demographics, HBOC management experience, insurance coverage of HBOC management, and educational opportunities related to HBOC. A total of 666 valid responses were received. Regarding the prevalence of HBOC practice, the majority of physicians responded in the negative and required human resources, information sharing and educational opportunities, and expanded insurance coverage to adopt and improve HBOC practice. Most physicians were not satisfied with the educational opportunities provided so far, and further expansion was desired. They remarked on the psychological burdens of many HBOC managements. Physicians reported these burdens could be alleviated by securing sufficient time to engage in HBOC management, creating easy-to-understand explanatory material for patients, collaboration with specialists in genetic medicine, and educational opportunities. Gynecologic oncologists in Japan are struggling to deal with psychological burdens in HBOC practice. To promote the clinical practice of HBOC management, there is an urgent need to strengthen human resources and improve educational opportunities, and expand insurance coverage for HBOC management.

Multiomic Characterization of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Enables High-Resolution Patient Stratification

Abstract Purpose: High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most common ovarian cancer type; most patients experience disease recurrence that accumulates chemoresistance, leading to treatment failure. Genomic and transcriptomic features have been associated with differential outcome and treatment response. However, the relationship between events at the gene sequence, copy number, and gene-expression levels remains poorly defined. Experimental Design: We perform multiomic characterization of a large HGSOC cohort (n = 362) with detailed clinical annotation to interrogate the relationship between patient subgroups defined by specific molecular events. Results: BRCA2-mutant (BRCA2m) and EMSY-overexpressing cases demonstrated prolonged survival [multivariable hazard ratios (HR) 0.40 and 0.51] and significantly higher first- and second-line chemotherapy response rate. CCNE1-gained (CCNE1g) cases demonstrated underrepresentation of FIGO stage IV cases, with shorter survival but no significant difference in treatment response. We demonstrate marked overlap between the TCGA- and Tothill-derived subtypes. IMR/C2 cases displayed higher BRCA1/2m frequency (25.5%, 32.5%) and significantly greater immune cell infiltration, whereas PRO/C5 cases had the highest CCNE1g rate (23.9%, 22.2%) and were uniformly low in immune cell infiltration. The survival benefit for cases with aberrations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes was apparent across all transcriptomic subtypes (HR range, 0.48–0.68). There was significant co-occurrence of RB loss and HRR gene aberrations; RB loss was further associated with favorable survival within HRR-aberrant cases (multivariable HR, 0.50). Conclusions: These data paint a high-resolution picture of the molecular landscape in HGSOC, better defining patients who may benefit most from specific molecular therapeutics and highlighting those for whom novel treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes.

Significance of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for vulvar cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group nationwide survey study

Abstract Objective This study aimed to show the results of radical radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for vulvar cancer (VC) based on data from a Japanese nationwide survey. Materials and methods We collected data from 108 institutions on cases of VC diagnosed between January 2001 and December 2010. Patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with curative intent were selected, and 172 patients with VC were included in this study. The collected data were analyzed for overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the prognostic factors for patients with VC. Results The median follow-up period was 16.8 (range; 3.2–154.8) months. Fifty-five patients received CCRT, and 117 patients received RT alone. The 2-year OS rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) for stages I, II, III, and IV were 77.9% (55.8–100.0), 71.9% (53.8–89.9), 55.4% (42.5–68.3), and 41.5% (27.3–55.7) respectively. Univariate analyses showed that the FIGO stage (p = 0.001), tumor diameter (p = 0.005), and lymph node (LN) status (p = 0.001) were associated with OS. The concurrent use of chemotherapy resulted in a significantly longer OS in Stage III (p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that the hazard ratios (95% CI) for tumor diameter, positivity for LN metastasis, and RT alone (no concurrent chemotherapy) were 1.502 (1.116–2.021), 1.801 (1.287–2.521), and 1.936 (1.187–3.159), respectively. Conclusions Our analysis revealed that CCRT should be recommended, especially for Stage III VC patients. Further studies are warranted to determine who benefits from CCRT, considering primary tumor size and LN status. The study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (protocol number: UMIN000017080) on April 8th, 2015.

Association between hospital treatment volume and survival of women with gynecologic malignancy in Japan: a JSOG tumor registry-based data extraction study

Associations between hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes for women with 3 types of gynecologic malignancies, and the trends and contributing factors for high-volume centers were examined. The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology tumor registry databased retrospective study examined 206,845 women with 80,741, 73,647, and 52,457 of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumor, respectively, who underwent primary treatment in Japan between 2004 and 2015. Associations between the annual treatment volume and overall survival (OS) for each tumor type were examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with restricted cubic splines. Institutions were categorized into 3 groups (low-, moderate-, and high-volume centers) based on hazard risks. Hazard ratio (HR) for OS each the 3 tumors decreased with hospital treatment volume. The cut-off points of treatment volume were defined for high- (≥50, ≥51, and ≥27), moderate- (20-49, 20-50, and 17-26), and low-volume centers (≤19, ≤19, and ≤16) by cases/year for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, rare tumor histology, and initial surgical management as contributing factors for women at high-volume centers (all, p<0.001). The proportion of high-volume center treatments decreased, whereas low-volume center treatments increased (all p<0.001). Treatment at high-volume centers improved OS than that at other centers (adjusted HR [aHR]=0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.78-0.88; aHR=0.78, 95% CI=0.75-0.83; and aHR=0.90, 95% CI=0.86-0.95 for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors). Hospital treatment volume impacted survival outcomes. Treatments at high-volume centers conferred survival benefits for women with gynecologic malignancies. The proportion of treatments at high-volume centers have been decreasing recently.

Impact of COVID‐19 on cervical cancer screening in Japan: A survey of population‐based screening in urban Japan by the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology

AbstractAimTo assess the impact of COVID‐19 on cervical cancer screening.MethodThe Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology launched COVID‐19 Task Force surveyed the municipalities in urban areas of Japan. Questionnaires were sent to 20 ordinance‐designated cities and 23 wards of Tokyo metropolitan area in Japan via telephone and mail in January 2021. An additional survey was conducted in March and April 2021, counted the monthly checkups in 2020 and, as a control data, the number of monthly checkups in 2019. “The State of Emergency” between April 7 and May 25, 2020, included 13 prefectures. The data collected in this research involved the number of screenings only. The chi‐square test was performed for statistical analysis.ResultsThe number of cancer screenings from March to August, with May being the month with the lowest number of screenings, was less than 50% of that in the previous year. In particular, the drop in the number of cancer screenings in the “Prefectures operating under special safety precautions” was remarkable and significantly lower than that in other Prefectures. However, after August, the number recovered to the usual level, despite the second wave of the pandemic occurring nationwide. The initial “the State of Emergency” caused a significant decrease in the number of people receiving population‐based screenings, but the recovery has been remarkable, and the total number is expected to be the same as in previous years.ConclusionThe initial “the State of Emergency” caused a significant decrease in the number of people receiving population‐based screenings.

Influence of Genomic Landscape on Cancer Immunotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer: Biomarker Analyses from the IMagyn050 Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Purpose: To explore whether patients with BRCA1/2-mutated or homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian cancers benefitted from atezolizumab in the phase III IMagyn050 (NCT03038100) trial. Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer were randomized to either atezolizumab or placebo with standard chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) was determined centrally (VENTANA SP142 assay). Genomic alterations, including deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations, genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI), were evaluated using the FoundationOne assay. HRD was defined as gLOH ≥ 16%, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status. Potential associations between progression-free survival (PFS) and genomic biomarkers were evaluated using standard correlation analyses and log-rank of Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Among biomarker-evaluable samples, 22% (234/1,050) harbored BRCA1/2 mutations and 46% (446/980) were HRD. Median TMB was low irrespective of BRCA1/2 or HRD. Only 3% (29/1,024) had TMB ≥10 mut/Mb, and 0.3% (3/1,022) were MSI-high. PFS was better in BRCA2-mutated versus BRCA2–non-mutated tumors and in HRD versus proficient tumors. PD-L1 positivity (≥1% expression on ICs) was associated with HRD but not BRCA1/2 mutations. PFS was not improved by adding atezolizumab in BRCA2-mutated or HRD tumors; there was a trend toward enhanced PFS with atezolizumab in BRCA1-mutated tumors. Conclusions: Most ovarian tumors have low TMB despite BRCA1/2 mutations or HRD. Neither BRCA1/2 mutation nor HRD predicted enhanced benefit from atezolizumab. This is the first randomized double-blind trial in ovarian cancer demonstrating that genomic instability triggered by BRCA1/2 mutation or HRD is not associated with improved sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. See related commentary by Al-Rawi et al., p. 1645

Analysis of postoperative adjuvant therapy in 102 patients with gastric-type mucinous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A multi-institutional study

Gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (GAS) is a novel variant of uterine cervix mucinous carcinoma. GAS is a distinct entity that can be distinguished from typical endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA). In Japan, postoperative adjuvant therapy for cervical cancer includes not only radiation therapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) but also chemotherapy in many cases. However, no previous studies have analyzed adjuvant therapy for GAS. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of adjuvant therapy for GAS. This was a preplanned secondary analysis of a dataset from previous nationwide, retrospective, observational study. The study population comprised women with stage I-II GAS who underwent surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients who did and did not receive adjuvant therapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data were analyzed for a total of 102 enrolled patients, who were classified as low- (17 patients), intermediate- (37 patients), or high risk (48 patients) based on the risk of postoperative cervical cancer recurrence. In the intermediate-risk group, median survival could not be assessed due to a lack of sufficient events, but the no-adjuvant and RT groups tended to exhibit better prognoses. In contrast, within the high-risk group, patients in the RT subgroup exhibited a trend towards better PFS and OS than those in the CCRT and chemotherapy groups. The prognosis of GAS was confirmed to be poor, even in cases of early-stage cancer and following surgical resection. Chemotherapy strategies, including CCRT as postoperative adjuvant therapy, tend to have a poor prognosis.

East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT): founding history and future perspective

Racial and regional differences exist in morbidity, histology, drug response, toxicity, and prognosis of gynecologic cancer. However, most large-scale phase III studies have been conducted in Western countries, and these data on Asians, who account for more than half of the world's population, are limited. To build a global clinical trial network in Asia, four clinical trial groups with high expertise and international competitiveness in East Asia, namely the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Japan, the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group in Korea, the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Taiwan, and the Chinese Gynecologic Cancer Society in the People's Republic of China, established a new group called the East Asia Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) on November 19, 2021. It includes four committees: the Cervical Cancer Committee, Uterine Corpus Cancer Committee, Ovarian Cancer Committee, and Translational Research Committee. The purpose of EAGOT is to conduct international clinical trials in an effort to provide the best treatments for Asian women affected by gynecologic cancer. Discussions on new collaborative clinical trials have already begun. The first Annual EAGOT Meeting was held on May 25-27, 2023 in Niigata, Japan. EAGOT, the largest healthcare/investigational innovation network in Asia in the area of gynecologic cancers, will become a platform for establishing standards of care and lead to guidelines for Asian women suffering from gynecologic cancer. The harmonization of regulatory/investigator-initiated clinical trials, simultaneous approval of unapproved drugs in the four countries under a common protocol, and expansion of indications will improve the prognosis of gynecologic cancers in Asia in the near future.

Prognostic significance of para-aortic node metastasis in endometrial cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG2043 post hoc analysis

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALX) and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer (EC) patients at risk of post-operative recurrence. Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 2043 was a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in EC patients at risk for post-operative recurrence. A retrospective analysis included patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLX) alone or both PLX and PALX in JGOG2043. Data on positive lymph nodes and other clinicopathological risk factors were collected. PLX and PALX were performed on 402 patients, while PLX alone was conducted on 250 patients. Evaluating the effect of PALX on survival was challenging through a comparison of the outcomes of the 2 cohorts since PALX was predominantly administered to higher-risk patients. Patients with 2 or more metastases in para-aortic nodes exhibited significantly poorer overall survival than those with no or 1 metastasis, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that 2 or more metastases in para-aortic nodes is independent risk factors for disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10-2.72; p=0.019) and are marginally significant for overall survival (HR=1.58; 95% CI=0.92-2.72; p=0.096) compared to no or a single metastasis. The clinical relevance of PALX was challenging to evaluate in the JGOG2043 cohort; however, the presence of 2 or more para-aortic node metastases was identified as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in EC patients at risk of recurrence.

Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma: an ancillary analysis of the JGOG3017-A4 study

Abstract Background Systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in stage IIB–IVB patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, undergoing complete abdominal macroscopic resection with normal lymph nodes, was revealed to have no prognostic significance for survival in the LION trial. However, the proportion of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) in the LION trial was only 2.2%, so the significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patients with OCCC remains unclear. Methods We conducted an ancillary analysis of 619 patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial (JGOG 3017) in patients with OCCC. Of these, 89 were stage IIB to IVB, underwent a complete macroscopic resection, and had no grossly enlarged lymph nodes intraoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups: group A with lymphadenectomy and group B without lymphadenectomy. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare the two groups. Results Among the 89 patients, 77 (86.5%) underwent a lymphadenectomy (group A), while 12 (13.5%) did not (group B). Three-year PFS were 62.3% in group A and 58.3% in group B ( p  = 0.7705). Three-year OS were 73.0% in group A and 65.6% in group B ( p  = 0.6346). No significant differences were observed between two groups. Conclusion This study did not demonstrate a definitive survival benefit from systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced OCCC patients with complete resection and clinically negative nodes. Given the small sample size, these results should be interpreted with caution and regarded as exploratory.

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and platinum chemotherapy in cervical cancer: results of Japanese population from BEATcc

This study analyzed the efficacy of add-on atezolizumab to standard first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in 56 Japanese patients with metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer treated across 8 sites under the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group between October 2018 and August 2021 in the BEATcc trial. Patients were randomized to standard arm (standard therapy: cisplatin 50 mg/m² or carboplatin area under the curve of 5, paclitaxel 175 mg/m², and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg) or experimental arm (standard therapy with atezolizumab 1,200 mg). Of 56 patients, 30 were in experimental arm vs. 26, standard arm (age: 53.2±12.9 vs. 54.7±12.2 years). Median progression-free survival was 15.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=10.4-26.1) in experimental arm vs. 11.1 months (8.4-16.5) in standard arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.51; 95% CI=0.26-1.01). Median overall survival was 34.1 months (23.2-38.6) in the experimental arm vs. 31.6 months (16.4-36.5), standard arm (HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.23-1.21). Objective response rate was 86.7% in experimental arm vs. 84.6%, standard arm. Complete response and partial response, respectively, were 23.3% and 63.3% in experimental arm and 26.9% and 57.7% in standard arm. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 80.0%, experimental arm and 88.5%, standard arm. Gastrointestinal/genitourinary fistula incidence was lower in Japanese patients (1 patient receiving atezolizumab), likely due to stricter inclusion criteria. Overall, add-on atezolizumab enhances the efficacy of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in Japanese patients as those in overall BEATcc population and could be considered a new first-line treatment option for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer in Japan. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03556839.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial

DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement with durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib, vs. carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We evaluated efficacy and safety in the Japan subset of DUO-E. Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to control arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab placebo [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab placebo + olaparib placebo), durvalumab arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [1,120 mg every 3 weeks] [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab [1,500 mg every 4 weeks] + olaparib placebo), or durvalumab + olaparib arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg twice a day]). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS for durvalumab and durvalumab + olaparib arms vs. control. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety in the Japan subset. In the Japan subset (n=88) PFS favored durvalumab (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.12) and durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85) vs. control; median PFS was 9.9 and 15.1 vs. 9.5 months, and the 18-month PFS rate was 37.0% and 42.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively. The safety profile in the Japan subset was generally consistent with the full safety analysis set and the established profiles of the individual agents. Efficacy and safety in the Japan subset were generally consistent with outcomes in the DUO-E ITT population. This Japanese subset analysis of DUO-E supports carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as new treatment options in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and is the first to report on these regimens in Japanese patients alone.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasm

The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm are revised from the 2018 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standardized care for uterine body neoplasm, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for uterine body neoplasm, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden on patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO guideline committee, based on a careful review of evidence from the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The main features of the 2023 revision are as follows: 1) The Guidelines Formulation Committee members were asked to understand Minds' medical guideline development method in advance. 2) The clinical question (CQ) was changed to Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome format as much as possible. 3) Introduced the "body of evidence," which summarizes the results of research reports collected for the CQs by outcome and study design, and the strength of evidence for each body of evidence was rated from levels A to D. 4) Introduction of systematic reviews in some CQs. 5) The strength of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, value and hope for patients, and clinical applicability were considered while drafting recommendations. Herein, we present the English version of the JSGO guidelines 2023 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm.

Niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. This was the follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with homologous recombination-deficient, platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of chemotherapy and were poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor naïve. Participants received niraparib (starting dose, 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 20 patients were enrolled in the study and included in both efficacy and safety analyses. Median total study duration was 759.5 days. Median dose intensity was 201.3 mg/day. Confirmed ORR was 60.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]=39.4-78.3); 2 patients had complete response and 10 patients had partial response. Median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI=3.9-26.9) and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI=68.3-98.8). The most common TEAEs were anemia (n=15), nausea (n=12), and decreased platelet count (n=11). TEAEs leading to study drug dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation were reported in 16 (80.0%), 15 (75.0%), and 2 patients (10.0%), respectively. The long-term efficacy and safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous findings in the equivalent population in non-Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.

Prognostic impact of the number of resected pelvic nodes in endometrial cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG2043 post hoc analysis

This study aimed to determine whether the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) affects the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients at post-operative risk of recurrence. JGOG2043 was a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of three chemotherapeutic regimens as adjuvant therapy in EC patients with post-operative recurrent risk. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in JGOG2043. The number of resected and positive nodes and other clinicopathologic risk factors for survival were retrieved. There were 83 patients in the group with less than 20 PLNs removed (group A), while 167 patients had 20 or more PLNs removed (group B). There was no significant difference in patients' backgrounds between the two groups, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was not significantly different. There was a trend toward fewer pelvic recurrences in group B compared with group A (3.5% vs. 9.6%; p=0.050). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (5-year overall survival [OS]=90.3% vs. 84.3%; p=0.199), multivariate analysis revealed that resection of 20 or more nodes is one of the independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval=0.24-0.99; p=0.048), as well as surgical stage, high-risk histology, and advanced age for OS. Resection of 20 or more PLNs was associated with improved pelvic control and better survival outcomes in EC patients at risk of recurrence who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone and were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer in Japan

Hospital treatment volume affects survival in patients with endometrial cancer; notably, initial treatment at high-volume centers improves survival outcomes. Our study assessed the effect of hospital treatment volume on cost-effectiveness and survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan. A decision-analytic model was evaluated using the following variables and their impact on cost-effectiveness: 1) hospital treatment volume (low-, intermediate-, and high-volume centers) and 2) postoperative recurrent risk factors based on pathological findings (high- and intermediate-risk or low-risk). Data were obtained from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology database, systematic literature searches, and the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was used as a measure of effectiveness. The model was built from a public healthcare perspective and the impact of uncertainty was assessed using sensitivity analyses. A base-case analysis showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at high-volume centers was below a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥5,000,000 with a maximum of ¥3,777,830/4.28 QALY for the high- and intermediate-risk group, and ¥2,316,695/4.57 QALY for the low-risk group. Treatment at the high-volume centers showed better efficiency and cost-effectiveness in both strategies compared to intermediate- or low-volume centers. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model outcome was robust to changes in input values. With the WTP threshold, treatment at high-volume centers remained cost-effective in at least 73.6% and 78.2% of iterations for high- and intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively. Treatment at high-volume centers is the most cost-effective strategy for guiding treatment centralization in patients with endometrial cancer.

Tisotumab vedotin in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: results from the innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 trial

Tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly longer overall survival compared with chemotherapy as second- or third-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in the phase III, multi-national, open-label innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 trial. We report the results of a sub-group analysis of enrolled Japanese patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to tisotumab vedotin or investigator-choice chemotherapy (topotecan [nogitecan hydrochloride], vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival. Among 502 randomized patients, 101 were Japanese (tisotumab vedotin, n = 50; chemotherapy, n = 51). With 13.7 months of median follow-up in Japanese patients, median overall survival was 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7 to not estimable) with tisotumab vedotin and 8.5 months (95% CI 6.8 to 10.6) with chemotherapy, representing a 55% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77). Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.0 months (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.95). The confirmed objective response rate was 24.0% (95% CI 13.1 to 38.2) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 10.4) with chemotherapy. All patients in the tisotumab vedotin and chemotherapy arms had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; grade ≥3 events occurred in 42.9% and 66.0%, respectively. Six patients (12.2%) discontinued tisotumab vedotin due to treatment-emergent adverse events. Consistent with global findings, tisotumab vedotin resulted in clinical improvement compared with chemotherapy across all efficacy end points, and demonstrated a manageable adverse event profile in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

A Study of Atezolizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in Participants With Newly-Diagnosed Stage III or Stage IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

This is a Phase III, global, double-blind, 2-arm randomized study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab versus placebo + paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab. Study participants will have Stage 3 or 4 ovarian cancer (OC), fallopian tube cancer (FTC), or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) with macroscopic residual disease postoperatively (i.e., after primary tumor reductive surgery) or who will undergo neoadjuvant therapy followed by interval surgery.