Investigator

Ahmet Akçay

Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Radiology

AAAhmet Akçay
Papers(4)
Diagnostic utility of…Role of magnetic reso…Updated endometrial c…Dynamic versus nondyn…
Collaborators(3)
Abdusselim Adil PekerH. ToprakZ. Dönmez
Institutions(1)
Bezmilem Vakf Niversi…

Papers

Updated endometrial cancer FIGO staging: the role of MRI in determining newly included histopathological criteria

Endometrial cancer (EC) is among the prevalent malignancies in gynecology, showing an increasing occurrence and mortality rate. The updated 2023 FIGO staging integrates both histopathological and molecular analyses, which significantly impact the prognosis and treatment approaches. This research aims to examine the effectiveness of MRI in identifying essential histopathological tumor features, including histological subtype, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion. A total of 106 patients diagnosed with EC from February 2018 to December 2023 underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. Surgical procedures followed ESMO guidelines, with histopathological assessments using FIGO 2009 criteria. Two radiologists independently evaluated MRI images, measuring maximum tumor size, minimum tumor ADC value (using a free-hand ROI technique), and ADC tumor/myometrium ratio. MRI findings were compared with histopathological data. Peritoneal implant presence and tumor size exhibited significant differences between endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC) and non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (NEEC), with p values of < 0.001 and 0.003, respectively. Significant differences in age, tumor size, ADC tumor, and ADC tumor/myometrium between low-grade and high-grade tumors were observed, with p values of < 0.001, 0.004, 0.006, and 0.011, respectively. Increased tumor size, reduced ADC tumor, ADC tumor/myometrium, and pelvic peritoneal implant presence were significantly associated with LVSI, with p values of < 0.001, 0.001, 0.002, and 0.001, respectively. The AUC values for tumor size, ADC tumor, and ADC tumor/myometrium were 0.842, 0.781 and 0.747, respectively, in distinguishing between low and high-grade endometrial tumors. Similarly, obtained AUC values for predicting LVSI were 0.836, 0.719, and 0.696, respectively. Our study emphasizes MRI's role in predicting tumor characteristics such as histological subtype, grade, and LVSI based on updated FIGO criteria. By highlighting the potential of MRI, this research contributes to our comprehension of improving diagnostic and clinical management for EC. Further multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish MRI's role in EC management.

Dynamic versus nondynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) scoring of adnexal masses: a comparative performance analysis

AİM: To compare the diagnostic performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) using dynamic and nondynamic contrast-enhanced protocols in the characterisation of adnexal masses. MATERİALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 369 patients (mean age, 43.6 ± 15 years) with 479 adnexal lesions who underwent pelvic MRI between January 2020 and March 2025. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed in 97 lesions and nondynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 382. Two radiologists, with 8 and 4 years of experience, independently reviewed all examinations while blinded to clinical and histopathological data. Lesions scored as O-RADS 2-3 were classified as benign and O-RADS 4-5 as malignant. Histopathology or ≥12 months of imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for both protocols. RESULTS: Among 479 lesions, 302 (76.8%) were benign, 28 (7.1%) borderline, and 63 (16.0%) malignant. The dynamic protocol achieved a sensitivity of 97.4%, specificity of 93.2%, PPV of 90.2%, NPV of 98.2%, and accuracy of 94.8%. The nondynamic protocol showed comparable results (sensitivity 96.4%, specificity 94.6%, PPV 91.2%, NPV 97.9%, accuracy 95.0%), with no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (P =0.794). Malignancy rates increased progressively with higher O-RADS categories in both protocols. CONCLUSION: O-RADS MRI provides a reliable framework for risk stratification of adnexal masses. Nondynamic contrast-enhanced MRI achieves diagnostic performance equivalent to DCE-MRI and can be confidently used when dynamic acquisition is not feasible, supporting broader clinical adoption of simplified O-RADS MRI protocols.

23Works
4Papers
3Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsPseudotumor CerebriEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingNeoplasm GradingDiagnosis, DifferentialEpididymitisOrchitis

Positions

Researcher

Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · Radiology

Education

2014

Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · faculty of medicine