Investigator

Abraham Peedicayil

Senior Consultant · Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynaecologic Oncology

About

APAbraham Peedicayil
Papers(5)
Survival outcomes of …A longitudinal study …Endometriosis and mal…Diagnostic Accuracy o…Diagnostic study of h…
Collaborators(10)
Anitha ThomasAjit SebastianVinotha ThomasRachel GeorgeThenmozhi ManiPriya BhatiAlka DahiyaRajesh KannangaiSudabeh MoeinAnjana Joel
Institutions(3)
Christian Medical Col…All India Institute O…Iu Health Foundation

Papers

Survival outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer treated at a tertiary-level hospital in India

Abstract Background: One needs to choose wisely between primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer. The aim was to determine the recurrence free survival and overall survival after surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer and also the risk factors for recurrence and death. Methods: Electronic medical records of 322 women operated for ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patients and their clinical outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were used for risk factor analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios were obtained for recurrence and death, adjusted for stage, primary treatment modality, residual disease and histology. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for probability of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The log rank test was used to compare survival probabilities. Results: The majority were stage III or stage IV (78%), serous histology (71%) and high grade (64%). Primary cytoreduction was done in 48% and interval cytoreduction in 52%. The median duration of follow up (survival) was 77 months (95% CI 72-82). There were 179 known recurrences (55.6 %). The estimated median time to recurrence was 22 (95% CI 14.5- 29.5) months. The independent risk factors for recurrence were neoadjuvant chemotherapy [HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.48-3.09], stage III/IV [HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.40-5.41], high grade serous histology [HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.12-2.54] and sub-optimal debulking [HR 3.15, 95% CI 2.19-4.55]. There were 78 known deaths (24.2 %) with a mean time to death of 24.3 (SD 16.1) months. The independent risk factors for death were sub-optimal debulking [HR 3.07; 95% CI 1.78-5.29] and stages III and IV cancer [HR 3.07; 95% CI 1.14-8.27]. Conclusions: Most ovarian cancers recur within 2 years. Risk factors for mortality are advanced stage and sub-optimal debulking. Maximal efforts at down staging and surgical resection will increase survival.

A longitudinal study of sexual health and quality of life in endometrial carcinoma survivors

This study aimed to assess sexual health and quality of life (QoL) in endometrial cancer survivors and the factors influencing these variables. A mixed method design comprising quantitative (cohort design) and qualitative (face-to-face interviews) aspects was chosen. A total of 132 patients who underwent surgery alone, surgery followed by adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy, or surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiation were included. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) questionnaires were used to assess the participants' sexual health and QoL at 6 months and 1 year post-treatment. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the factors associated with general and sexual well-being. At 1 year, 89% of the participants still had low sexual function scores. Survivors over 50 years (OR 284.7, 95% CI 13 to 364, p<0.001) and educated below graduate level (OR 26.8, 95% CI 2 to 370, p=0.014) had low sexual function scores. Patients who had surgery alone had better QoL than those who received adjuvant radiation. Women who had surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation had the lowest QoL scores (OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 19.5, p=0.001). All scores improved with time. This study demonstrated the high prevalence of low sexual function and poor QoL in endometrial cancer survivors. There was a communication gap between the women and their partners as well as their healthcare providers. This study highlights the need for discussion about the survivors' sexual well-being and QoL.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fluorescein Sodium for Targeted Cervical Biopsies

Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer screening are widely used in low resource settings. Fluorescent sodium could improve accuracy of cancer screening. This study aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy of fluorescein sodium (FNa) to detect cervical neoplasia. Seventy consecutive patients referred for colposcopy were enrolled prospectively. Acetic acid, Lugol's iodine, and FNa were used sequentially. Biopsies were taken from all abnormal areas. If there was no obvious abnormality, two random biopsies and endocervical curettage were done. Reference standard was the highest grade lesion on cervical biopsy with a threshold of CIN2+. The patterns of each staining agent were recorded as absent, faint, or distinct. Diagnostic accuracy estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Correlation between the various tests were also determined using the kappa statistic. There were 27 cases of CIN2+ (38.6%). The sensitivity of any fluorescence for CIN2+ was 82% (62, 94) and for distinct fluorescence was 59% (39, 78). The specificity was 65% (49, 79) for any fluorescence and 95% (84, 99) for distinct fluorescence, the same as for Swede score > 7. For any fluorescence, the positive likelihood ratio was 2.34 (1.5, 3.65) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.28 (0.13, 0.65). For distinct fluorescence, the positive likelihood ratio was 12.74 (3.18, 51.1) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.43 (0.27, 0.68). There was moderate correlation between FNa and the other tests. Distinct fluorescence with FNa was very specific, low cost, and easy to perform and may contribute to confirm CIN2+ disease.

Diagnostic study of human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical and vaginal samples using the filter paper card

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA samples on filter paper in comparison to specimen transport medium (STM).MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional diagnostic study of 42 consecutive women who were prospectively recruited. Each had self‐collected vaginal samples on filter paper, physician‐collected cervical samples on filter paper, and physician‐collected cervical samples in STM. HPV DNA testing was performed with a Hybrid Capture 2 system (Qiagen). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and agreement of filter paper methods with the standard procedure were calculated.ResultsThe overall prevalence of HPV in STM was 67.5%. Detection of HPV DNA in the physician‐collected cervical samples on filter paper had a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 68.4%. The patient's self‐sampling on filter paper had a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 59.1%. The agreement between STM method and physician‐collected sample on filter paper was substantial, (κ = 0.695, P &lt; 0.001), while the agreement between STM and self‐collected samples on filter paper was moderate (κ = 0.565, P &lt; 0.001). Most patients reported that self‐collection was acceptable (100%), painless (95%), and not embarrassing (95%).ConclusionFilter paper, with dried self‐collected vaginal samples, can be used to detect high‐risk HPV with acceptable accuracy.

110Works
5Papers
11Collaborators

Positions

2021–

Senior Consultant

Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Center · Gynaecologic Oncology

Professor & Head

Christian Medical College, Vellore · Gynaecologic Oncology

Keywords
Clinical epidemiologist Gynaecologic oncologist
Links & IDs
0000-0002-9318-566

Scopus: 53870513200