Investigator
Konkuk University
Prognostic impact of intraoperative rupture in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: an ancillary study of GORILLA-3002
To evaluate whether intraoperative rupture affects oncological outcomes in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). A multicenter retrospective study was conducted on patients with early-stage EOC based on surgical and final pathological reports between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the unruptured group (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage IA/IB) and ruptured group (FIGO stage IC1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for the imbalance in prognostic factors between the groups. Overall, 197 (58.3 %) patients comprised the unruptured group (FIGO stage IA/IB), and 141 (41.7 %) were in the intraoperatively ruptured group (FIGO stage IC1). No significant difference in the 5-year PFS was observed between the two groups before PSM (92.65 % vs. 92.80 %, P = 0.93). After PSM, the 5-year PFS showed a noticeable decrease in the ruptured group compared to the unruptured group, although this difference showed borderline statistical significance (96.90 % vs. 89.82 %, P = 0.061). This trend was particularly discernible in cases with aggressive tumor characteristics; intraoperative rupture remained an independent prognostic factor for shorter PFS in patients with high-grade histology (adjusted hazard ratio = 14.4, 95 % confidence interval = 2.8-74.1). Although not statistically significant, intraoperative rupture may negatively affect PFS in these patients after PSM. Therefore, rupture during surgery should be avoided as it can cause upstaging and unnecessary chemotherapy.
Is restaging surgery quintessential in suspected early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer? An ancillary study of the Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLaborAtion study (GORILLA-3002)
To assess the necessity of restaging surgery for patients with suspected International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following incomplete surgical staging. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients with early-stage EOC referred for restaging. These patients were diagnosed with suspected FIGO stage I-II EOC between January 2007 and November 2022 after incomplete surgical staging, and no residual region was confirmed by radiological evaluation. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined. Among the 173 patients included in the study, 56 were assigned to the no restaging surgery group, and 117 to the restaging surgery group. After restaging, 23 were upstaged to other main stage. However, PFS and OS were not significantly different between the groups, also, dividing the groups into 4 groups who underwent chemotherapy and those who did not also did not show significant differences. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade independently influenced PFS outcomes. While restaging surgery resulted in upstaging in some patients, it was not associated with significant differences in PFS or OS in this retrospective analysis. However, the omission of any additional treatment warrants careful consideration and further discussion. Nevertheless, the observation that patients who did not undergo restaging surgery but received adjuvant chemotherapy did not show significantly different prognoses highlights the need for further research to establish appropriate treatment strategies tailored to diverse patient contexts.
Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study
This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically early-stage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; non-lymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients. No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107-0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm, lymphadenectomy should be performed according to histologic subtype and subsequent chemotherapy in patients with clinically early-stage EOC. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007309.
