Late Radiation Toxicities in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: A Postoperative IMRT/Brachytherapy Study

NCT07435623RecruitingOBSERVATIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Tata Memorial Hospital

Enrollment

300

Start Date

2025-05-10

Completion Date

2025-07-10

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Official Title

Assessment of Late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicities in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Requiring Postoperative IMRT and/or Brachytherapy

Conditions

Endometrial CancerCervix Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years – 75 Years

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients more than 18 years of age at the time of diagnosis.
* All patients with confirmed histological diagnosis of cervical or endometrial cancer.
* Only those patients who have received adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy with IMRT and/or brachytherapy at TMH/ACTREC will be included.
* Patients whose follow up information available

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with incomplete treatment details.
* Patient having residual disease post-surgery.
* Patient treated for post-operative recurrences.
* Patient who lost to follow up.
* Patients with Immunosuppressive disorder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

3 years incidence of ≥ grade II Gastrointestinal & Genitourinary toxicities

To audit the 3 years incidence of ≥ grade II Gastrointestinal \& Genitourinary toxicities in women receiving Adjuvant IMRT (with or without chemotherapy) for cervical and endometrial cancer between January 2020 to December 2023

Time frame: 3 years

Secondary Outcomes

Report acute toxicity in patients receiving adjuvant RT

To report acute toxicity in patients receiving adjuvant RT from the time of treatment completion till 3 years

Time frame: 3 years

Assess disease free and overall survival (for cervix and endometrial cancer separately).

To assess 3-year disease free and overall survival (for cervix and endometrial cancer separately) from the time of treatment completion to 3 years

Time frame: 3 Years

Assess local regional control

To assess 3 years local regional control from the time of treatment completion till 3 years

Time frame: 3 Years

Report dose-volume parameters for prediction of late grades II-IV gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity

Report dose-volume parameters for prediction of late grades II-IV gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity from treatment completion till 3 years

Time frame: 3 Years

compare outcomes with ongoing and completed institutional postoperative IMRT trials

To compare outcomes with ongoing and completed institutional postoperative IMRT trials from the time of treatment completion to 3 years

Time frame: 3 Years

Locations

Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Linked Papers

2021-09-10

Late Toxicity After Adjuvant Conventional Radiation Versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer (PARCER): A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER), a phase III randomized trial, compared late toxicity after image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in women with cervical cancer undergoing postoperative radiation. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive either IG-IMRT or 3D-CRT after stratification for the type of hysterectomy and use of concurrent chemotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0 and estimated using time-to-event, intention-to-treat analysis, with a study level type I error of 0.05 and a nominal α of .047 after accounting for one interim analysis. Secondary end points included acute toxicity, health-related quality of life, and pelvic relapse-free, disease-free, and overall survival. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned (IG-IMRT 151 and 3D-CRT 149). At a median follow-up of 46 (interquartile range, 20-72) months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity in the IG-IMRT and 3D-CRT arms were 21.1% versus 42.4% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 any late toxicity was 28.1% versus 48.9% (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.76; P < .001), respectively. Patients reported reduced diarrhea ( P = .04), improved appetite ( P = .008), and lesser bowel symptoms ( P = .002) with IG-IMRT. However, no difference was observed in the time by treatment interaction. The 3-year pelvic relapse-free survival and disease-free survival in the IG-IMRT versus the 3D-CRT arm were 81.8% versus 84% (HR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.99; P = .55) and 76.9% versus 81.2% (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.71; P = .89), respectively. CONCLUSION IG-IMRT results in reduced toxicity with no difference in disease outcomes.

2020-10-28

Long-Term Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life After Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy or Radiation Therapy Alone for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in the Randomized PORTEC-3 Trial

The survival results of the PORTEC-3 trial showed a significant improvement in both overall and failure-free survival with chemoradiation therapy versus pelvic radiation therapy alone. The present analysis was performed to compare long-term adverse events (AE) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In the study, 660 women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemoradiation therapy (2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel) or radiation therapy alone. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. HRQOL was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24/OV28 subscales and compared with normative data. An as-treated analysis was performed. Median follow-up was 74.6 months; 574 (87%) patients were evaluable for HRQOL. At 5 years, grade ≥2 AE were scored for 78 (38%) patients who had received chemoradiation therapy versus 46 (24%) who had received radiation therapy alone (P = .008). Grade 3 AE did not differ significantly between the groups (8% vs 5%, P = .18) at 5 years, and only one new late grade 4 toxicity had been reported. At 3 and 5 years, sensory neuropathy toxicity grade ≥2 persisted after chemoradiation therapy in 6% (vs 0% after radiation therapy, P < .001) and more patients reported significant tingling or numbness at HRQOL (27% vs 8%, P < .001 at 3 years; 24% vs 9%, P = .002 at 5 years). Up to 3 years, more patients who had chemoradiation therapy reported limb weakness (21% vs 5%, P < .001) and lower physical (79 vs 87, P < .001) and role functioning (78 vs 88, P < .001) scores. Both treatment groups reported similar long-term global health/quality of life scores, which were better than those of the normative population. This study shows a long-lasting, clinically relevant, negative impact of chemoradiation therapy on toxicity and HRQOL, most importantly persistent peripheral sensory neuropathy. Physical and role functioning impairments were seen until 3 years. These long-term data are essential for patient information and shared decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.