The Correlation Between HRD Detection and the Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

NCT06242392NOT_YET_RECRUITINGOBSERVATIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Fujian Cancer Hospital

Enrollment

250

Start Date

2024-01-31

Completion Date

2026-05-01

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Official Title

The Correlation Between Homologous Recombination Deficiency Detection and the Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

Interventions

homologous recombination deficiency

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer (any histological type) and possessing complete pathological hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slides and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks.
* Patients must be 18 years of age or older.
* Patients should not have concurrent multiple primary cancers.
* Patients must undergo an MRI or CT scan prior to starting treatment.
* According to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria, patients must have at least one measurable lesion.
* Participants must provide informed consent, voluntarily cooperate with clinical follow-up, and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who do not have accessible tumor tissue required for Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) testing.
* Patients whose clinical records are incomplete, making it impossible to effectively compare treatment efficacy.
* Patients who are lost to follow-up and for whom subsequent treatment outcomes cannot be tracked.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Efficacy of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is used to evaluate the efficacy of PARP inhibitor treatment in ovarian cancer with different HRD (Homologous Recombination Deficiency) statuses.

Time frame: 2026-5-1

Secondary Outcomes

cost-effectiveness analysis of using PARP inhibitors to treat cervical cancer

The main economic outcome is the ICER.Health benefits were expressed as life years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The ICER was calculated by dividing the incremental cost difference between the two strategies, by the incremental difference in health outcomes (LYs and QALYs). Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) was performed to assess the impact of uncertainty around the key parameters of the model on the ICER. A second-order Monte Carlo simulation with 1000 iterations was used to run replicated outcomes. The normal distributions used for costs, utility and reimbursement ratio were carried to the specific limits.

Time frame: 2026-5-1

PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Overall survival (OS) was used toevaluate the efficacy of PARP inhibitor treatment in ovarian cancer with different HRD (Homologous Recombination Deficiency) statuses.

Time frame: 2026-5-1

Linked Papers

2021-12-01

European experts consensus: BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency testing in first-line ovarian cancer

Homologous recombination repair (HRR) enables fault-free repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. HRR deficiency is predicted to occur in around half of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Ovarian cancers harbouring HRR deficiency typically exhibit sensitivity to poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Current guidelines recommend a range of approaches for genetic testing to identify predictors of sensitivity to PARPi in ovarian cancer and to identify genetic predisposition. To establish a European-wide consensus for genetic testing (including the genetic care pathway), decision making and clinical management of patients with recently diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, and the validity of biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of PARPi in the first-line setting. The collaborative European experts' consensus group consisted of a steering committee (n = 14) and contributors (n = 84). A (modified) Delphi process was used to establish consensus statements based on a systematic literature search, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A consensus was reached on 34 statements amongst 98 caregivers (including oncologists, pathologists, clinical geneticists, genetic researchers, and patient advocates). The statements concentrated on (i) the value of testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and HRR deficiency testing, including when and whom to test; (ii) the importance of developing new and better HRR deficiency tests; (iii) the importance of germline non-BRCA HRR and mismatch repair gene mutations for predicting familial risk, but not for predicting sensitivity to PARPi, in the first-line setting; (iv) who should be able to inform patients about genetic testing, and what training and education should these caregivers receive. These consensus recommendations, from a multidisciplinary panel of experts from across Europe, provide clear guidance on the use of BRCA and HRR deficiency testing for recently diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

2020-09-28

ESMO recommendations on predictive biomarker testing for homologous recombination deficiency and PARP inhibitor benefit in ovarian cancer

Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is a frequent feature of high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma (HGSC) and is associated with sensitivity to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) therapy. HRD testing provides an opportunity to optimise PARPi use in HGSC but methodologies are diverse and clinical application remains controversial. To define best practice for HRD testing in HGSC the ESMO Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group launched a collaborative project that incorporated a systematic review approach. The main aims were to (i) define the term 'HRD test'; (ii) provide an overview of the biological rationale and the level of evidence supporting currently available HRD tests; (iii) provide recommendations on the clinical utility of HRD tests in clinical management of HGSC. A broad range of repair genes, genomic scars, mutational signatures and functional assays are associated with a history of HRD. Currently, the clinical validity of HRD tests in ovarian cancer is best assessed, not in terms of biological HRD status per se, but in terms of PARPi benefit. Clinical trials evidence supports the use of BRCA mutation testing and two commercially available assays that also incorporate genomic instability for identifying subgroups of HGSCs that derive different magnitudes of benefit from PARPi therapy, albeit with some variation by clinical scenario. These tests can be used to inform treatment selection and scheduling but their use is limited by a failure to consistently identify a subgroup of patients who derive no benefit from PARPis in most studies. Existing tests lack negative predictive value and inadequately address the complex and dynamic nature of the HRD phenotype. Currently available HRD tests are useful for predicting likely magnitude of benefit from PARPis but better biomarkers are urgently needed to better identify current homologous recombination proficiency status and stratify HGSC management.