MIRRORS-RCT Pilot: Role of Robotic Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

NCT05960630UNKNOWNNAINTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Enrollment

20

Start Date

2023-10-02

Completion Date

2024-12-01

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

MIRRORS-RCT (Pilot): Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of Robotic Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneal Cancer (EOC) Following MIRRORS-protocol vs Standard Open Interval Cytoreductive Surgery

Interventions

MIRRORS ProtocolStandard Open Cytoreductive Surgery

Conditions

Ovarian CancerOvarian NeoplasmOvarian Neoplasm EpithelialFallopian Tube CancerFallopian Tube NeoplasmsPeritoneal Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Women with Stage IIIc-IVb epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) (including cancer of the fallopian tube \& peritoneum) undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
* Pelvic mass ≤8 cm on CT
* Age ≥18years

Exclusion Criteria:

* A Pelvic Mass \>8cm
* Not Suitable for interval cytoreductive surgery.
* Lacks capacity to understand or complete trial documentation.
* Patients not suitable for laparoscopy,
* Specialist surgical support is required and open surgery is recommended by the speciality team involved.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Recruitment

Number of patients consented compared to the number offered inclusion expressed as a percentage.

Time frame: Assessed at close of recruitment 6-8 months (recruitment period)

Secondary Outcomes

Rate of conversion to open surgery

Percentage of patients converted to open surgery after being deemed suitable for Robotic interval debulking surgery following initial diagnostic laparoscopy. Success criteria: Conversion to open surgery rate is less than 50% of the patient group deemed suitable for Robotic interval debulking surgery following initial diagnostic laparoscopy.

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Blood loss

blood loss during surgery in mililitres

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Maximal macroscopic cytoreduction rate (R=0 rate)

Percentage of patients undergoing MIRRORS protocol who achieve maximal macroscopic debulking i.e. no macroscopic residual disease present (R=0 rate) vs standard open interval cytoreductive surgery

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Surgical complications

Intraoperative complications will be recorded. Post operative complications will be recorded and classified by Clavien-Dindo Classification. Success criteria: Complication rate is not higher for MIRRORS protocol compared to standard open interval cytoreductive surgery.

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Length of stay

Days from operation date. Operation date=day 0

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Days to chemotherapy

Days from operation date. Operation date=day 0

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Cost of MIRRORS protocol vs standard interval cytoreductive surgery

Cost comparison focusing on resources used in hospital (surgery, length of stay, readmissions, outpatients, A\&E) and in the community post discharge (primary and community care). Contacts with services and professionals will be converted to costs using validated national tariffs and NHS Reference costs. The primary health-related outcome for the economic analysis will be EQ-5D-5L, completed by participants at baseline and at each assessment point. Responses will be used to estimate the patients' health related quality of life (utility level) at each time point. This will be done by scoring the EQ-5D 5L using a validated national tariff. The utility scores will be integrated over time to provide the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), accrued by each participant over the duration of the trial. A comparison of the difference in costs and difference in QALYs over the trial period will be conducted using appropriate statistical tests to assess significance.

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Pain assessment

Numeric rating scale (NRS11) 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain) At baseline and post-operatively; day 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 6 weeks

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Quality of life following surgery (generic) expressed as QALY gain using EQ5D-5L

At baseline and post-operatively; day 1, 3, 7, 10, 14,21,6 weeks

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Quality of life following surgery (cancer specific)

Assessed using patient reported outcome measure (PROM) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Validated quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) for ovarian cancer (QLQ-C30/QLQ-OV28). This validated questionnaire consists of the core module and its associated ovarian cancer specific module. Completed at baseline, day 3 post surgery, 3 weeks post-surgery and 6 weeks post surgery.

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Mental wellbeing

Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) A (Anxiety) and D (Depression) scores are calculated separately. 0-7 = Normal, 8-10 = Borderline, 11-21 = Abnormal (case) Completed at baseline, day 3 post surgery, 3 weeks post-surgery and 6 weeks post surgery.

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Locations

Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom

Linked Papers

2024-06-03

MIRRORS: a prospective cohort study assessing the feasibility of robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer

To establish the feasibility and safety of robotic interval debulking surgery following the MIRRORS protocol (robot-assisted laparoscopic assessment prior to robotic or open surgery) in women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. MIRRORS is the first of three planned trials: MIRRORS, MIRRORS-RCT (pilot), and MIRRORS-RCT. The participants were patients with stage IIIc-IVb epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, suitable for interval debulking surgery with a pelvic mass ≤8 cm. The intervention was robot-assisted laparoscopic assessment prior to robotic or open interval debulking surgery (MIRRORS protocol). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment, and the secondary outcomes were quality of life (EORTC QLQC30/OV28, HADS questionnaires), pain, surgical complications, complete cytoreduction rate (%), conversion to open surgery (%), and overall and progression-free survival at 1 year. Overall, 95.8% (23/24) of patients who were eligible were recruited. Median age was 68 years (range 53-83). All patients had high grade serous histology and were BRCA negative. In total, 56.5% were stage IV, 43.5% were stage III, 87.0% had a partial response, while 13.0% had stable disease by RECIST 1.1. Median peritoneal cancer index was 24 (range 6-38). Following MIRRORS protocol, 87.0% (20/23) underwent robotic interval debulking surgery, and 13.0% (3/23) had open surgery. All patients achieved R<1 (robotic R0=47.4%, open R0=0%). No patients had conversion to open. Median estimated blood loss was 50 mL for robotic (range 20-500 mL), 2026 mL for open (range 2000-2800 mL) (p=0.001). Median intensive care length of stay was 0 days for robotic (range 0-8) and 3 days (range 3-13) for MIRRORS Open (p=0.012). The median length of stay was 1.5 days for robotic (range 1-17), 6 days for open (range 5-41) (p=0.012). The time to chemotherapy was as follows 18.5 days for robotic (range 13-28), 25 days for open (range 22-28) (p=0.139). Robotic interval debulking surgery appears safe and feasible for experienced robotic surgeons in patients with a pelvic mass ≤8 cm. A randomized controlled trial (MIRRORS-RCT) will determine whether MIRRORS protocol has non-inferior survival (overall and progression-free) compared with open interval debulking surgery.

MIRRORS-RCT Pilot: Role of Robotic Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer