Uterine Manipulator Versus No Uterine Manipulator in Endometrial Cancer Trial

NCT05687084RecruitingNAINTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Universita di Verona

Enrollment

1030

Start Date

2023-01-16

Completion Date

2031-12-31

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Oncologic Outcomes of Use Versus Not Use of the Uterine Manipulator in the Surgical Treatment of Apparent Uterine-confined Endometrial Carcinoma

Interventions

Uterine manipulator use

Conditions

Endometrial Neoplasms

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years – 100 Years

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer of any histology (including carcinosarcoma) and grade
* Planned surgical treatment including hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (ovarian preservation in selected patients is not an exclusion criterion)
* Age ≥ 18 years
* No preoperative evidence of extrauterine disease (Clinical stage IIIA, IIIB)
* No preoperative evidence of suspicious lymph nodes (Clinical stage IIIC)
* No preoperative evidence of distant metastasis (Clinical stage IV)
* Approved and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Neoadjuvant therapy
* Synchronous or previous (\< 5 years) invasive cancer, not including non-melanoma skin cancer
* Fertility preservation
* World Health Organization performance score \> 2
* Uterine sarcoma
* Previous pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy, hormone therapy for cancer (\< 5 years), chemotherapy (\< 5 years), pelvic or paraaortic lymphadenectomy, or retroperitoneal surgery
* Inadequate bone marrow function (white blood cells \<3·0×109/L, platelets \<100×109/L)
* Inadequate liver function (bilirubin \>1.5×upper normal limit \[UNL\], aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase \>2.5 × UNL)
* Inadequate kidney function (creatinine clearance \< 60 mL per min calculated according to Cockcroft-Gault 10 or \< 50 mL per min Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance)
* Intraoperative evidence of stage IV disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence-free survival

Any recurrence or death related to endometrial cancer (EC) or treatment

Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery

Secondary Outcomes

Cause-specific survival

Any death related to endometrial cancer (EC) or treatment

Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery

Overall survival

Any death for any cause

Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery

Site-specific recurrence-free survival

Any recurrence per site of first recurrence

Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery

Operative time

Time between first incision and skin closure

Time frame: Day of surgery

Intraoperative blood loss

Total blood aspirate during the surgical procedure

Time frame: Day of surgery

30-day post-surgical morbidity

Perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification

Time frame: 30 days after surgery

Lymphovascular space invasion

Presence of lymphovascular space invasion at definitive pathology

Time frame: Day of surgery

Peritoneal cytology

Presence of positive peritoneal cytology at definitive pathology

Time frame: Day of surgery

Quality of life indexes

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) - A 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of Health-Related Quality of Life in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Score range 0-108. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life.

Time frame: Each follow-up visit, up to 4 years from the day of surgery

Locations

UOC Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy

UOC Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy

AOUI Verona - University of Verona - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Verona, Italy

Linked Papers

2024-12-02

A randomized controlled trial on the oncologic outcomes of use of the intrauterine manipulator in the treatment of apparent uterine-confined endometrial carcinoma: the MANEC Trial

The intrauterine manipulator used during a hysterectomy for endometrial cancer has been suggested as a reason for worsening oncologic outcomes. However, only a few non-randomized retrospective studies have investigated this association. To compare 4-year recurrence-free survival in the group of patients who undergo hysterectomy using an intrauterine manipulator with that of those who undergo hysterectomy without it. Patients with endometrial cancer who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with an intrauterine manipulator would have a lower recurrence-free survival than patients who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy without a manipulator. Multicenter, parallel arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult women diagnosed with apparently uterine-confined endometrial cancer of any histology are eligible. We exclude women who had synchronous or previous (2, and had inadequate baseline organ function. 4-Year recurrence-free survival defined as any relapse or death related to endometrial cancer or treatment calculated from randomization to the date of the first recurrence-free survival event. With an accrual time of 4 years, a minimum follow-up length of 4 years, and a two-sided type I error of 0.05, we need to enroll 515 women per arm to have a statistical power of 80% to reject the null hypothesis (HR for recurrence=1), assuming that patients who undergo hysterectomy with the use of the intrauterine manipulator have a 3-year recurrence rate of 12.5% and without the use of the intrauterine manipulator of 8.5% (HR for recurrence=1.50), and that 5% of patients are lost at follow-up in each arm, with a median time of 24 months. Accrual completion is expected in 2028, and result presentation in 2032. ClinicalTrial.gov ID NCT05687084.

2020-07-18

Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery

There are limited data available to indicate whether oncological outcomes might be influenced by the uterine manipulator, which is used at the time of hysterectomy for minimally invasive surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. The current evidence derives from retrospective studies with limited sample sizes. Without substantial evidence to support its use, surgeons are required to make decisions about its use based only on their personal choice and surgical experience. To evaluate the use of the uterine manipulator on oncological outcomes after minimally invasive surgery, for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. We performed a retrospective multicentric study to assess the oncological safety of uterine manipulator use in patients with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer, treated with minimally invasive surgery. The type of manipulator, surgical staging, histology, lymphovascular space invasion, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, adjuvant treatment, recurrence, and pattern of recurrence were evaluated. The primary objective was to determine the relapse rate. The secondary objective was to determine recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and the pattern of recurrence. A total of 2661 women from 15 centers were included; 1756 patients underwent hysterectomy with a uterine manipulator and 905 without it. Both groups were balanced with respect to histology, tumor grade, myometrial invasion, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, and adjuvant therapy. The rate of recurrence was 11.69% in the uterine manipulator group and 7.4% in the no-manipulator group (P<.001). The use of the uterine manipulator was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.20; P=.006). The use of uterine manipulator in uterus-confined endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] I-II) was associated with lower disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.97; P=.027) and higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.83; P=.026). No differences were found regarding the pattern of recurrence between both groups (chi-square statistic, 1.74; P=.63). In this study, the use of a uterine manipulator was associated with a worse oncological outcome in patients with uterus-confined endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I-II) who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Prospective trials are essential to confirm these results.