Therapeutic Effect of Surgical Debulking of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Cancer Stage IIICr

Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We report the overall survival results from the second interim analysis of this study. Eligible patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA regardless of nodal status), locally advanced, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive five cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Pembrolizumab or placebo and cisplatin were administered intravenously. Patients were stratified at randomisation by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cervical cancer stage at screening (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy [equivalent dose of 2 Gy]). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by investigator or by histopathological confirmation of suspected disease progression and overall survival defined as the time from randomisation to death due to any cause. Safety was a secondary endpoint. Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 patients at 176 sites in 30 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At the protocol-specified second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 8, 2024), median follow-up was 29·9 months (IQR 23·3-34·3). Median overall survival was not reached in either group; 36-month overall survival was 82·6% (95% CI 78·4-86·1) in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 74·8% (70·1-78·8) in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio for death was 0·67 (95% CI 0·50-0·90; p=0·0040), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. 413 (78%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 371 (70%) of 530 in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group had a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with anaemia, white blood cell count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased being the most common adverse events. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 206 (39%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 90 (17%) of 530 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945. Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer These data, together with results from the first interim analysis, support this immuno-chemoradiotherapy strategy as a new standard of care for this population. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Risk factors for lower extremity lymphedema after surgery in cervical and endometrial cancer

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a well-known adverse effect related to cervical and endometrial cancer (CEC); however, very few studies have elucidated the clinicopathologic risk factors related to LEL. We investigated the incidence and risk factors in patients who received primary surgery and/or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy for CEC. We retrospectively reviewed 2,565 patients who underwent primary surgery following CEC diagnosis between January 2007 and December 2020. LEL diagnosis was based on objective and subjective assessments by experts. We identified important predictors of LEL to construct a nomogram predicting individual risks of LEL. For internal validation of the nomogram, the original data were separated using the split-sample method in a 7:3 ratio of training data and test data. Overall, 858 patients (33.5%) received RT, 586 received external beam RT (EBRT), and 630 received intracavitary RT. During follow-up period, LEL developed in 331 patients, with an overall cumulative 5-year incidence of 13.3%. In multivariate analysis, age at primary treatment, use of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, type of hysterectomy, type of surgical pelvic lymph node (LN) assessment, number of dissected pelvic and para-aortic LNs, and EBRT field were the independent predictors of LEL. We subsequently developed the nomogram showing excellent predictive power for LEL. LEL is associated with various treatment modalities, and their interactions may increase the possibility of occurrences. De-escalation strategies for treatment modalities should be considered to reduce LEL in patients with CEC.

Challenges in lower limb lymphoedema assessment based on limb volume change: Lessons learnt from the SENTIX prospective multicentre study

Lower limb lymphoedema (LLL) is the most disabling adverse effect of surgical staging of pelvic lymph nodes. However, the lack of standardisation of volumetric LLL assessment hinders direct comparison between the studies and makes LLL reporting unreliable. The aim of our study is to report outcomes from a prospective trial that have implications for LLL assessment standardisation. In the prospective international multicentre trial SENTIX, a group of 150 patients with stage IA1-IB2 cervical cancer treated by uterine surgery with bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsy was prospectively evaluated by objective LLL assessment, based on limb volume change (LVC) using circumferrential limb measurements and subjective patient-reported swelling. The assessments were conducted in six-month periods over 24 months post-surgery. Patient LVC substantially fluctuated in both positive and negative directions, which were comparable in frequency up to ±14% change. Thirty-eight patients experienced persistent LVC increase >10% classified as LLL, with nine months median time to onset. Some 34.2% of cases experienced onset later than one year after the surgery. Thirty-three patients (22%) experienced transient oedema characterised as LVC >10%, which resolved without intervention between two consequent follow-up visits. No significant correlation between LVC >10% and a patient-reported swelling was observed. Given that we observed comparable fluctuations of the the lower-limb volumes after surgical treatment of cervical cancer in both positive and negative direction up to ±14%, the diagnostic threshold for LLL diagnosis based on LVC should be increased to >15% LVC. The distinction of transient oedema from persistent LLL requires repeated measurements. Also, as one-third of LLL cases are diagnosed >1-year post-surgery, a sufficient follow-up duration needs to be ensured. Patient-reported swelling correlated poorly with LVC and should only be used as an adjunct to objective LLL assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063.

Comparing survival outcomes for cervical cancer based on the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging systems

AbstractThe International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging system was modified in 2018, introducing new stage IB subdivisions and new lymph node status considerations in stage IIIC. We compared cervical cancer survival outcomes according to the 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems. We selected 10% of cervical cancer cases (2010–2015) from the Korean national cancer registry (2010–2015) through a systematic sampling method. We collected information using a collaborative stage data collection system and evaluated the results according to both staging systems. The log-rank test was used to analyze overall survival differences. No significant difference in survival was observed between 2018 subdivisions IB1/IB2/IB3 (P = 0.069), whereas a considerable difference was observed between these subdivisions according to histological subtypes. In the 2018 FIGO staging system, stage IIIC had better survival than stage IIIA/IIIB (P &lt; 0.001). We observed considerable heterogeneity in 2018 stage IIIC related to the corresponding stages of the 2014 staging system (stages IA1–IIIB). The size of the primary cervical mass was related to survival (P &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, using lymph node status to define stage IIIC captured a broad range of prognoses. The inclusion of primary tumor size considerations may improve the staging accuracy of advanced cervical cancer.

Comparing survival outcomes between surgical and radiographic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

To investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between women who underwent surgical versus radiographic assessment of pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) and para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) prior to chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. In this retrospective cohort analysis, patients with stage IB2 - IIIB squamous cell, adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who completed concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) between 2000 and 2017 from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry were identified. A 1:2 propensity score matching between surgical and imaging groups was performed and PFS and OS were compared between groups. 148 patients were identified and after propensity score matching, 35 from the surgical group and 70 from the imaging group were included in the analysis. There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. The median follow-up time was 41 months (range 7-218) for the surgical group and 51.5 months (range 7-198) for the imaging group. Five-year PFS was 62.6% for the surgical group and 72.4% in imaging group (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.54-2.30, p = 0.77). Five-year OS was 70.2% for the surgical group and 70.5% for the imaging group (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.46-2.29, p = 0.96). FIGO stage, PALN metastasis, and parametrial involvement were found to be poor prognosticators for PFS and OS in univariate analysis. Only PALN metastasis significantly predicted unfavorable PFS (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.23-6.18, p = 0.01) and OS (HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.40-8.55, p = 0.01) in multivariate analysis. There were no differences in locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (p = 0.33 and 0.59 respectively). Patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiographic assessment of PLN and PALN had comparable survival outcomes to surgical assessment.

Strategies for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer with Bulky Pelvic Lymph Nodes: An Overview of the Current Evidence

Cervical cancer commonly metastasizes first to the pelvic lymph nodes and then subsequently spreads to distant organs, making lymph node metastases the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer, and the strategy for its treatment directly influences prognosis. This review focuses on the treatment strategies for cases of cervical cancer with bulky pelvic lymph nodes. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment modality for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases, but it is inadequate for bulky pelvic lymph nodes. Accordingly, surgical resection of the bulky lymph nodes has been attempted, and its therapeutic significance has been reported. If the bulky lymph nodes are unresectable, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is performed. If it yields an inadequate degree of lymph node shrinkage, boosted radiation should be considered. The addition of chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy has also been reported to be effective in patients with lymph node metastases and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2020

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with the disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the guidelines, including changes to first- and second-line systemic therapy recommendations for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, and emerging evidence on a new histopathologic classification system for HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma.

Hwa Kyung Byun

Joongyo Lee

Kristina Butler

Ritchie Delara

Sang Hee Im

Won Jeong Son

Yong Bae Kim

Yun Ho Roh