Niraparib for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Unresectable Ovarian Cancer

NCT04507841Active, Not RecruitingPHASE2INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Tongji Hospital

Enrollment

67

Start Date

2021-01-08

Completion Date

2023-09-25

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

Niraparib for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Unresectable Ovarian Cancer

Interventions

Niraparib

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years – 75 Years

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

1. The informed consent form must be provided before any procedure of the trial, and the informed consent form shall be filed in the research center;
2. Female patients aged between 18 and 75 years old;
3. Patients received open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, or coarse needle aspiration biopsy and confirmed as high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer (hereinafter referred to as ovarian cancer). FIGO stage III-IV;
4. BRCA1/2 gene mutation or HRD was confirmed by tissue or blood samples detected by the testing institution designated by the research center;
5. Blood and tissue samples can be obtained before, during, and after treatment, and the subjects agree to submit the blood and tissue samples to the central laboratory for the expanded research purposes of the trial, including but not limited to: I. possible gene-related research. II. Possible tumor markers related studies;
6. There is at least one lesion that can be measured by CT / MRI;
7. The professional gynecological oncologists appointed by each center should judge the patients who can not achieve R0 tumor reduction or can not tolerate surgery,

   The criteria for failure to achieve R0 tumor reduction include but are not limited to:

   i. Fagotti score ≥ 8 \[2\];

   II. When the laparoscopic evaluation method is difficult to implement, the upper abdominal CT Score ≥ 3 can be used \[3\].

   The criteria for intolerance to surgery can be considered as follows:

   III. advanced age: age ≥ 80;

   IV. body mass index: BMI ≥ 40.0;

   v. A variety of chronic diseases;

   Vi. malnutrition or hypoproteinemia;

   VII. Moderate to massive ascites;

   VIII. Newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism;

   IX. physical status: ECOG \> 2.
8. The expected survival time was more than 12 weeks;
9. The ECOG score was 0-2;
10. Good organ function, including:

    i. Bone marrow function: neutrophil count ≥ 1500 / μ L; platelet ≥ 100000 / μ L; hemoglobin ≥ 10g / dl

    II. Liver function: total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal value or direct bilirubin ≤ 1.0 times of the upper limit of normal value; AST and alt ≤ 2.5 times of the upper limit of normal value; when liver metastasis exists, it must be ≤ 5 times of the upper limit of normal value

    III. renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal value, or creatinine clearance rate ≥ 60ml / min (calculated according to Cockcroft Gault formula);
11. For women with fertility potential, if blood test or urine pregnancy test is negative within one week before enrollment, effective contraceptive measures must be taken, such as physical barrier contraceptive method (condom) or complete abstinence. Oral, injectable or implantable hormonal contraceptives are not allowed. Or women without reproductive potential, defined as:

    i. Natural menopause and menopause for more than 1 year;

    II. Surgical sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or hysterectomy);

    III. serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and plasma estradiol levels were within the menopausal criteria of the research center laboratory.
12. Understand the trial process and have the ability to comply with the trial protocol for the trial duration, including any treatment, examination, inspection, follow-up, and questionnaire required for the completion of the experiment;
13. The patients were willing to complete the questionnaire survey of quality of life during the trial treatment and follow-up, and agreed that the results of the questionnaire survey could be used in clinical research;
14. The toxicity of any previous chemotherapy has returned to ≤ CTCAE 1 or baseline level, except for sensory neuropathy or alopecia with stable symptoms ≤ CTCAE grade 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

\-

The enrolled patients should not contain any of the following conditions:

1. Personnel involved in the formulation or implementation of the research plan;
2. Other clinical drug experiments participated in by using other experimental research drugs at the same time as the study;
3. At the same time of this study, other neoadjuvant therapies for cancer should be used, including but not limited to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, microbial therapy, traditional Chinese medicine treatment, and other experimental therapies;
4. Those who are known to be allergic to niraparib or active or inactive components of drugs with a similar chemical structure to niraparib;
5. Inability to swallow oral drugs and any gastrointestinal diseases that may interfere with the absorption and metabolism of the study drugs, such as uncontrollable nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal obstruction or malabsorption;
6. Have received any anti-cancer treatment for ovarian cancer;
7. Have been treated with known or possible PARP inhibitors in the past;
8. Symptomatic or uncontrolled brain metastases requiring simultaneous treatment, including but not limited to surgery, radiation and / or corticosteroids, or clinical manifestations of spinal cord compression;
9. Major surgery was performed within 3 weeks before the start of the study or did not recover after the operation;
10. The subjects had other malignant diseases in the past 3 years, except skin squamous cell carcinoma, basal-like carcinoma, breast intraductal carcinoma in situ, or cervical carcinoma in situ.
11. The patient had a previous or current diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML);
12. Patients with serious and uncontrollable diseases or the general situation of the subjects judged by the researchers to be unsuitable for joining the study, including but not limited to: active viral infection, such as human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, etc.; severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable ventricular arrhythmia, myocardial infarction in the last three months; uncontrollable epileptic grand mal seizure, no control Stable spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome or other mental disorders that affect patients' informed consent; hypertension beyond drug control; immune deficiency (except splenectomy) or other diseases that researchers believe may expose patients to high-risk toxicity; and;
13. Any medical history or existing clinical evidence indicates that there may be confusion of study results, interference with patients' compliance with the trial protocol throughout the study treatment period, or not in the best interests of patients;
14. The patient received platelet or red blood cell transfusion within four weeks before the start of treatment of the study drug;
15. Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who plan to become pregnant during the study treatment.
16. Unsolved clinical toxicity (≥ grade 2, except alopecia, neuralgia, lymphopenia, and depigmentation of skin)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

R0 resection rate

the percentage of patients received R0 resection after Niraparib neoadjuvant treatment.

Time frame: 3-month

Overall Response Rate (ORR) After Neoadjuvant treatment

Overall Response Rate according to RECIST1.1 after Neoadjuvant treatment. ORR is defined as the proportion of participants achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST (v.1.1). Per RECIST 1.1, CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SoD) of target lesions.

Time frame: 3-month

Secondary Outcomes

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate is defined as the proportion of participants achieving Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) according to RECIST1.1 and CA125 according to GCIC guidelines

Time frame: 3-month

Complete pathologic response rate

Complete pathologic response rate is measured according to Miller-Panye system.

Time frame: 3-month

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time in months from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death as assessed by the Investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.

Time frame: 3-year

Overall survival (OS)

Overall survival. OS is defined as the time from the study enrollment to death due to any cause.

Time frame: 5-year

Quality of Life (QOL) measures using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT- ovarian cancer)

To evaluate quality of life (QOL) for the subjects undergoing this treatment, using validated tools. QOL will be assessed every 3 months during treatment course. \[Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian Cancer questionnaire (score range from 0 to 160. Higher scores represent better quality of life.

Time frame: 5 years

Patient report outcome, EQ-VAS

life quality assessment. EQ-VAS, EuroQol-visual analogue scales. Score range from 0 \[worse outcome\] to 10 \[better outcome\]).

Time frame: 3 years

Rate of treatment interruption and termination

The rate of treatment interruption and termination caused by patients' intolerance of treatment side effects and other reasons;

Time frame: 5 years

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0

To further describe safety and assess toxicities encountered with the use of the proposed treatment regimen in patients with stage III, all stage IV ovarian cancer.

Time frame: 5 years

Overall Response Rate (ORR) during niraparib maintain treatment

Overall Response Rate according to RECIST1.1 during niraparib maintain treatment. ORR is defined as the proportion of participants achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST (v.1.1). Per RECIST 1.1, CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SoD) of target lesions.

Time frame: 1 year

Locations

Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China

Linked Papers

2025-02-03

Niraparib restricts intraperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer by eliciting CD36-dependent ferroptosis

Ovarian cancer (OC) is prone to peritoneum or omentum dissemination, thus giving rise to the formidable challenge of unresectable surgery and a dismal survival rate. Although niraparib holds a pivotal role in the maintenance treatment of OC, its effect on suppressing metastases during primary intervention remains enigmatic. Recently, we initiated a prospective clinical study (NCT04507841) in order to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant niraparib monotherapy for advanced OC with homologous recombination deficiency. An analysis of patient tumor burden before and after the niraparib challenge showed a remarkable vulnerability of OC intraperitoneal metastases to niraparib exposure. This killing capacity of niraparib was closely associated with the accumulation of fatty acids within the abdomen, which was confirmed by the increased susceptibility of tumor cells to niraparib treatment in the presence of fatty acids. In the context of abundant fatty acids, niraparib elevated intracellular levels of fatty acids and lipid peroxidation, leading to subsequent tumor cell ferroptosis in a p53 and BRCA-independent manner. Notably, under niraparib exposure, a critical fatty acid transporter CD36 was dramatically upregulated in tumors, facilitating excessive uptake of fatty acids. Pharmacological inhibition of either ferroptosis or CD36 impaired the anti-tumor activity of niraparib both in vitro and in murine intraperitoneal ID8 tumor models. Our findings demonstrate ferroptosis as a novel mechanism underlying the regression of OC metastases induced by niraparib, thereby offering tantalizing prospects for the frontline application of this agent in the management of OC.

2024-10-04

PARP inhibitors enhance antitumor immune responses by triggering pyroptosis via TNF–caspase 8–GSDMD/E axis in ovarian cancer

Background In addition to their established action of synthetic lethality in tumor cells, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) also orchestrate tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) that contributes to suppressing tumor growth. However, it remains not fully understood whether and how PARPis trigger tumor-targeting immune responses. Methods To decode the immune responses reshaped by PARPis, we conducted T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of paired clinical specimens before and after niraparib monotherapy obtained from a prospective study, as well as ID8 mouse ovarian tumors. To validate the induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) by PARPis, we performed immunofluorescence/IHC staining with homologous recombination deficiency tumor cells and patient-derived xenograft tumor tissues, respectively. To substantiate that PARPis elicited tumor cell pyroptosis, we undertook comprehensive assessments of the cellular morphological features, cleavage of gasdermin (GSDM) proteins, and activation of TNF-caspase signaling pathways through genetic downregulation/depletion and selective inhibition. We also evaluated the critical role of pyroptosis in tumor suppression and immune activation following niraparib treatment using a syngeneic mouse model with implanting CRISPR/Cas9 edited Gsdme−/ − ID8 tumor cells into C57BL/6 mice. Results Our findings revealed that PARPis augmented the proportion of neoantigen-recognized TCR clones and TCR clonal expansion, and induced an inflamed TIME characterized by increased infiltration of both innate and adaptive immune cells. This PARPis-strengthened immune response was associated with the induction of ICD, specifically identified as pyroptosis, which possessed distinctive morphological features and GSDMD/E cleavage. It was validated that the cleavage of GSDMD/E was due to elevated caspase 8 activity downstream of the TNFR1, rather than FAS and TRAIL-R. On PARP inhibition, the NF-κB signaling pathway was activated, leading to increased secretion of TNF-α and subsequent initiation of the TNFR1–caspase 8 cascade. Impeding pyroptosis through the depletion of Gsdme significantly compromised the tumor-suppressing effects of PARP inhibition and undermined the anti-immune response in the syngeneic ID8 mouse model. Conclusions PARPis induce a specific type of ICD called pyroptosis via TNF–caspase 8–GSDMD/E axis, resulting in an inflamed TIME and augmentation of tumor-targeting immune responses. These findings deepen our understanding of PARPis activities and point toward a promising avenue for synergizing PARPis with immunotherapeutic interventions. Trial registration number NCT04507841.

Niraparib for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Unresectable Ovarian Cancer