Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

NCT04269200Active, Not RecruitingPHASE3INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

AstraZeneca

Enrollment

805

Start Date

2020-05-05

Completion Date

2024-07-08

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

A Randomised, Multicentre, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study of First-line Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Combination With Durvalumab, Followed by Maintenance Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer (DUO-E)

Interventions

olaparibdurvalumabdurvalumab placeboolaparib placeboCarboplatinPaclitaxel

Conditions

Endometrial Neoplasms

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years – 150 Years

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥18 years at the time of screening and female.
* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial endometrial carcinoma. All histologies, including carcinosarcomas, will be allowed. Sarcomas will not be allowed.
* Patient must have endometrial cancer in one of the following categories:

  1. Newly diagnosed Stage III disease (measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 following surgery or diagnostic biopsy),
  2. Newly diagnosed Stage IV disease (with or without disease following surgery or diagnostic biopsy)
  3. Recurrence of disease (measurable or non-measurable disease per RECIST 1.1) where the potential for cure by surgery alone or in combination is poor.
* Naïve to first line systemic anti-cancer treatment. For patients with recurrent disease only, prior systemic anti-cancer treatment is allowed only if it was administered in the adjuvant setting and there is at least 12 months from date of last dose of systemic anti-cancer treatment administered to date of subsequent relapse
* FPPE tumor sample must be available for MMR evaluation.
* Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 within 7 days of starting study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.
* Brain metastases or spinal cord compression.
* Prior treatment with PARP inhibitors.
* Any prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy, including (but not limited to) other anti CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-programmed-cell-death ligand 2 (anti-PD-L2) antibodies, excluding therapeutic anticancer vaccines.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST 1.1, Based on Investigator Assessments

To demonstrate the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy by assessment of PFS (using investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 \[RECIST 1.1\]) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

Time frame: At baseline, every 9 weeks (wks) up to 18 wks, then every 12 wks until objective radiological disease progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO (08 Jul 2024 DCO for China cohort), up to 50 months

Secondary Outcomes

Overall Survival (OS) Analysis

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of OS

Time frame: Survival assessed every 2 months after RECIST defined radiological progression; assessed through study completion, up to 83 months

Time From Randomisation to Second Progression or Death (PFS2) Based on Local Standard Clinical Practice

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of PFS2

Time frame: At baseline, every 9 to 18 wks, then every 12 wks until objective radiological disease progression. Assessments then per local practice every 12 wks until second progression. Assessed until 12Apr2023 DCO (08Jul2024 DCO for China cohort), up to 50 months

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of ORR

Time frame: At baseline, every 9 to 18 wks, then every 12 wks until objective radiological disease progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO (08 Jul 2024 DCO for China cohort), up to 50 months

Duration of Response (DoR) Based on Investigator Assessment

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of DoR

Time frame: At baseline, every 9 wks up to 18 wks, then every 12 wks until objective radiological disease progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO, up to 35 months

Time From Randomisation to First Subsequent Therapy or Death (TFST)

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of TFST

Time frame: Time elapsed from randomisation to first subsequent therapy or death. Assessed every 12 wks following treatment discontinuation, through study completion (up to 83 months)

Time From Randomisation to Second Subsequent Therapy or Death (TSST)

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of TSST

Time frame: Time elapsed from randomisation to second subsequent therapy or death. Assessed every 12 wks following treatment discontinuation, through study completion (up to 83 months)

Time From Randomisation to Discontinuation of Treatment or Death (TDT)

To determine the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients by assessment of TDT

Time frame: Time elapsed from randomisation to study treatment discontinuation or death. Assessed through study completion, up to 83 months

Serum Concentration of Durvalumab

To characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) of durvalumab and durvalumab in combination with olaparib

Time frame: PK sampling performed on Day 85 pre-dose, Day 183 pre-dose, and 3 months after study treatment discontinuation (up to 36 months)

Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab

To characterise the immunogenicity of durvalumab and durvalumab in combination with olaparib

Time frame: Immunogenicity sampling performed on Day 1 pre-dose, Day 85 pre-dose, Day 183 pre-dose, and 3 and 6 months after study treatment discontinuation (up to 39 months)

Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Score of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

To determine effects on symptoms, functioning, and overall health related quality of life (HRQoL) of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients. The physical functioning score is a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the physical functioning score indicate better health status/function.

Time frame: At baseline, every 3 wks until Wk 18, and every 4 wks until the second progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO, up to 35 months. The average treatment effect over the first 12 months after randomisation is presented.

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/QoL Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30

To determine effects on symptoms, functioning, and overall HRQoL of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone in newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients. The global health status/quality of life (QoL) is a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health status/QoL indicate better health status/function.

Time frame: At baseline, every 3 wks until Wk 18, and every 4 wks until the second progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO, up to 35 months. The average treatment effect over the first 12 months after randomisation is presented.

Locations

Research Site, Tucson, United States

Research Site, Concord, United States

Research Site, La Jolla, United States

Research Site, San Francisco, United States

Research Site, Santa Barbara, United States

Research Site, Aurora, United States

Research Site, Fort Lauderdale, United States

Research Site, Tampa, United States

Research Site, Savannah, United States

Research Site, Honolulu, United States

Research Site, Arlington Heights, United States

Research Site, Chicago, United States

Research Site, Indianapolis, United States

Research Site, Louisville, United States

Research Site, Baton Rouge, United States

Research Site, Boston, United States

Research Site, Saint Paul, United States

Research Site, Jackson, United States

Research Site, Lebanon, United States

Research Site, Camden, United States

Research Site, Paramus, United States

Research Site, New York, United States

Research Site, New York, United States

Research Site, Pinehurst, United States

Research Site, Cleveland, United States

Research Site, Cleveland, United States

Research Site, Dayton, United States

Research Site, Oklahoma City, United States

Research Site, Tulsa, United States

Research Site, Eugene, United States

Research Site, Tigard, United States

Research Site, Pittsburgh, United States

Research Site, Providence, United States

Research Site, Sioux Falls, United States

Research Site, Chattanooga, United States

Research Site, Germantown, United States

Research Site, Knoxville, United States

Research Site, Bedford, United States

Research Site, Dallas, United States

Research Site, Houston, United States

Research Site, San Antonio, United States

Research Site, Sugar Land, United States

Research Site, Tyler, United States

Research Site, Webster, United States

Research Site, Fairfax, United States

Research Site, Norfolk, United States

Research Site, Seattle, United States

Research Site, Morgantown, United States

Research Site, Madison, United States

Research Site, Milwaukee, United States

Research Site, Clayton, Australia

Research Site, Malvern, Australia

Research Site, Melbourne, Australia

Research Site, Nedlands, Australia

Research Site, Sydney, Australia

Research Site, Bruges, Belgium

Research Site, Brussels, Belgium

Research Site, Charleroi, Belgium

Research Site, Ghent, Belgium

Research Site, Hasselt, Belgium

Research Site, Kortrijk, Belgium

Research Site, Leuven, Belgium

Research Site, Libramont-Chevigny, Belgium

Research Site, Liège, Belgium

Research Site, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Research Site, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Research Site, Curitiba, Brazil

Research Site, Passo Fundo, Brazil

Research Site, Pelotas, Brazil

Research Site, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Research Site, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Research Site, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Research Site, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Research Site, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil

Research Site, São Paulo, Brazil

Research Site, São Paulo, Brazil

Research Site, Calgary, Canada

Research Site, Toronto, Canada

Research Site, Toronto, Canada

Research Site, Montreal, Canada

Research Site, Montreal, Canada

Research Site, Montreal, Canada

Research Site, Montreal, Canada

Research Site, Beijing, China

Research Site, Beijing, China

Research Site, Changchun, China

Research Site, Changchun, China

Research Site, Changsha, China

Research Site, Changsha, China

Research Site, Chengdu, China

Research Site, Chongqing, China

Research Site, Chongqing, China

Research Site, Dalian, China

Research Site, Dalian, China

Research Site, Guangdong, China

Research Site, Guangzhou, China

Research Site, Haikou, China

Research Site, Harbin, China

Research Site, Hefei, China

Research Site, Nanning, China

Research Site, Shanghai, China

Research Site, Shenyang, China

Research Site, Taiyuan, China

Research Site, Tianjin, China

Research Site, Wuhan, China

Research Site, Wuhan, China

Research Site, Zhanjiang, China

Research Site, Zhengzhou, China

Research Site, Zhengzhou, China

Research Site, Barranquilla, Colombia

Research Site, Bogotá, Colombia

Research Site, Bogotá, Colombia

Research Site, Bogotá, Colombia

Research Site, Cali, Colombia

Research Site, Medellín, Colombia

Research Site, Medellín, Colombia

Research Site, Montería, Colombia

Research Site, Pereira, Colombia

Research Site, Tallinn, Estonia

Research Site, Tartu, Estonia

Research Site, Bonn, Germany

Research Site, Chemnitz, Germany

Research Site, Dresden, Germany

Research Site, Erlangen, Germany

Research Site, Leipzig, Germany

Research Site, Athens, Greece

Research Site, Chaïdári, Greece

Research Site, Thessaloniki, Greece

Research Site, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Research Site, Budapest, Hungary

Research Site, Budapest, Hungary

Research Site, Budapest, Hungary

Research Site, Debrecen, Hungary

Research Site, Győr, Hungary

Research Site, Szolnok, Hungary

Research Site, Hisar, India

Research Site, Mumbai, India

Research Site, Be’er Ya‘aqov, Israel

Research Site, Hadera, Israel

Research Site, Jerusalem, Israel

Research Site, Nahariya, Israel

Research Site, Tel Aviv, Israel

Research Site, Chūōku, Japan

Research Site, Kashiwa-shi, Japan

Research Site, Kōtoku, Japan

Research Site, Kurume-shi, Japan

Research Site, Kyoto, Japan

Research Site, Matsuyama, Japan

Research Site, Minatoku, Japan

Research Site, Nagoya, Japan

Research Site, Nakagami-gun, Japan

Research Site, Niigata, Japan

Research Site, Osaka, Japan

Research Site, Osaka, Japan

Research Site, Sapporo, Japan

Research Site, Shinjuku-ku, Japan

Research Site, Sunto-gun, Japan

Research Site, Toon-Shi, Japan

Research Site, Tsu, Japan

Research Site, Yokohama, Japan

Research Site, Kaunas, Lithuania

Research Site, Vilnius, Lithuania

Research Site, Vilnius, Lithuania

Research Site, Aguascalientes, Mexico

Research Site, México, Mexico

Research Site, Monterrey, Mexico

Research Site, Oaxaca City, Mexico

Research Site, Querétaro, Mexico

Research Site, San Luis Potosí City, Mexico

Research Site, Veracruz, Mexico

Research Site, Gdansk, Poland

Research Site, Lodz, Poland

Research Site, Lublin, Poland

Research Site, Olsztyn, Poland

Research Site, Olsztyn, Poland

Research Site, Anzorey, Russia

Research Site, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia

Research Site, Krasnodar, Russia

Research Site, Moscow, Russia

Research Site, Moscow, Russia

Research Site, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Research Site, Saransk, Russia

Research Site, Sochi, Russia

Research Site, Singapore, Singapore

Research Site, Singapore, Singapore

Research Site, Singapore, Singapore

Research Site, Goyang-si, South Korea

Research Site, Seoul, South Korea

Research Site, Seoul, South Korea

Research Site, Seoul, South Korea

Research Site, Seoul, South Korea

Research Site, Seoul, South Korea

Research Site, Seoul, South Korea

Research Site, Suwon, South Korea

Research Site, Yangsan, South Korea

Research Site, Barcelona, Spain

Research Site, Barcelona, Spain

Research Site, El Palmar, Spain

Research Site, Girona, Spain

Research Site, Jaén, Spain

Research Site, Madrid, Spain

Research Site, Mallorca, Spain

Linked Papers

2024-02-29

Adding immunotherapy to first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer

Immunotherapy has transformed the endometrial cancer treatment landscape, particularly for those exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency [MMRd/microsatellite instability-hypermutated (MSI-H)]. A growing body of evidence supports the integration of immunotherapy with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment strategy. Recently, findings from ongoing trials such as RUBY (NCT03981796), NRG-GY018 (NCT03914612), AtTEnd (NCT03603184), and DUO-E (NCT04269200) have been disclosed. This paper constitutes a review and meta-analysis of phase III trials investigating the role of immunotherapy in the first-line setting for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. The pooled data from 2320 patients across these trials substantiate the adoption of chemotherapy alongside immunotherapy, revealing a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.79] across all patient groups. Progression-free survival benefits are more pronounced in MMRd/MSI-H tumors (n = 563; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.43). This benefit, albeit less robust, persists in the MMR-proficient/microsatellite stable group (n = 1757; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91). Pooled data further indicate that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy enhances overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone in all patients (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89). However, overall survival data maturity remains low. The incorporation of immunotherapy into the initial treatment for advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer brings about a substantial improvement in oncologic outcomes, especially within the MMRd/MSI-H subset. This specific subgroup is currently a focal point of investigation for evaluating the potential of chemotherapy-free regimens. Ongoing exploratory analyses aim to identify non-responding patients eligible for inclusion in clinical trials.

Linked Investigators