Evaluation of Weekly Ixabepilone With or Without Biweekly Bevacizumab

NCT03093155CompletedPHASE2INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Yale University

Enrollment

78

Start Date

2017-04-03

Completion Date

2022-12-29

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

A Randomized Phase II Evaluation of Weekly Ixabepilone With or Without Biweekly Bevacizumab in Recurrent or Persistent Platinum-resistant/Refractory Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancers

Interventions

IxabepiloneBevacizumab

Conditions

Epithelial Ovarian CancerFallopian Tube CancerPrimary Peritoneal Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years – 100 Years

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients must have platinum-resistant/refractory (i.e., platinum-free interval \<6 months) recurrent or persistent histologically confirmed epithelial (non-mucinous) ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Patients may have serous, endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or transitional cell/malignant Brenner, mixed, or undifferentiated histologies.

* Patients must have specimen available for immunohistochemistry for class III β-tubulin status; recurrent tumor specimen is preferred, though this may be performed on primary tumor if no recurrent tumor is available.
* All patients must have measurable disease. Measurable disease is defined as lesions that can be measured by physical examination or by means of medical imaging techniques. Measurable disease is defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest dimension to be recorded). Each lesion must be ≥ 20 mm when measured by conventional techniques, including palpation or plain x-ray, or ≥ 10 mm when measured by spiral CT and/or MRI. Ascites and pleural effusions are not to be considered measurable disease.
* Patients must have at least one "target lesion" to be used to assess response on this protocol as defined by RECIST v1.1 Tumors within a previously irradiated field will be designated as "non-target" lesions unless progression is documented or a biopsy is obtained to confirm persistence at least 90 days following completion of radiation therapy.
* At the time of initial surgery, patients may have been optimally (\<1 cm diameter residual disease) or sub-optimally (≥1 cm diameter of residual disease) debulked.
* Patients with measurable recurrent disease of any previous stage (I-IV) are eligible to enrollment.
* The diagnosis must be histologically confirmed by a gynecologic pathologist.
* Patients must have adequate bone marrow, kidney, and liver function:

  1. Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1500 cells/mm3
  2. Platelets greater than or equal to 100,000/uL
  3. Renal function: creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL
  4. Hepatic function: Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X laboratory normal
  5. SGOT/SGPT ≤ 3 X laboratory normal.
* Patients must have an ECOG performance status of 0-2.
* Patients must have signed an approved informed consent.
* Patients must have recovered from effects of recent surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. They should be free of significant infection.
* Patients must have received prior treatment with taxanes. There is no limit on the number of prior lines of therapy.
* Patients may have received prior bevacizumab therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. A 3-week washout period is required.
* Patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the study entry and be practicing an effective form of contraception (section 7.5.3).
* Patients must be at least 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with a history of other invasive malignancies, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers, are excluded if there is any evidence of other malignancy present within the last five years. Patients are also excluded if their previous cancer treatment contraindicates this protocol therapy.
* Patients who have a significant history of cardiac disease, i.e., uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, or uncontrolled arrhythmias within 6 months of registration (NYHA classification III-IV).
* Patients with any unstable medical issue (including cardiac issues as above, active treatment for symptomatic pulmonary embolism, CVA, renal or hepatic insufficiency, active infection/sepsis requiring intravenous antibiotics). In patients who have undergone surgery, 28 days should elapse before initiation and the surgical site should be adequately healed.
* Known brain/leptomeningeal involvement of the disease, active neurological disease such as uncontrolled seizure disorder or moderate to severe dementia.
* Patients who have received prior therapy with any covalent irreversible anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (e.g., vandetanib).
* Patients known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and active hepatitis, even if liver function studies are in the eligible range.
* Known hemorrhagic diathesis or active bleeding disorder, including platelet count \<100,000/uL, or inadequate granulocytes, including an absolute neutrophil count \<1500 cells/mm.
* Any hypersensitivity to Cremophor® EL or polyoxyethylated castor oil.
* CTCAE grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Differences Between Ixabepilone Alone and Ixabepilone + Bevacizumab

Progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, will be defined as the length of time from randomization to disease recurrence, disease progression, or death for any reason. The timeframe was updated upon results entry.

Time frame: Up to 37 months

Secondary Outcomes

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Treatment response will be based on RECIST v1.1 Guidelines for measurable lesions. Objective response rate (ORR) includes evaluation for partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Time frame was updated upon results entry.

Time frame: Up to 37 months

Overall Survival (OS) Differences Between Ixabepilone Alone and Ixabepilone + Bevacizumab

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Time frame was updated upon results entry.

Time frame: Up to 37 months

Number of Participants With Treatment Related SAEs

Safety profile of Ixabepilone in combination with Bevacizumab as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Presented are the number of participants that experienced SAE's related to study drug. Full reporting of adverse events is presented in the Adverse Events module. Time frame was updated upon results entry.

Time frame: Up to 37 months

Differences in Response to the Combination of Ixabepilone and Bevacizumab in Relationship to Previous Treatment With Bevacizumab and Taxanes

Assess whether prior treatment with Taxanes impacts future response to Bevacizumab in combination with Ixabepilone. BEST RESPONSE using RECIST Criteria- Complete Response (CR): The disappearance of all target lesions. There should be no evidence of disease, and any pathological lymph nodes must have reduced in size to normal (short axis less than 10 mm). Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesion

Time frame: Up to 41 months

Durable Disease Control Rate (DDCR) Differences Between Ixabepilone Alone and Ixabepilone + Bevacizumab

Treatment response will be based on RECIST v1.1 Guidelines for measurable lesions. Objective response rate (ORR) includes evaluation for partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Durable Disease Control (DDC) is defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months from date of best response. Presented are the counts of those that achieved DDC.

Time frame: 5 Years

Locations

Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven, New Haven, United States

Marlene & Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States

Linked Papers

2023-04-18

Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

Many women, and other females, with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Drugs that inhibit angiogenesis (development of new blood vessels), essential for tumour growth, control cancer growth by denying blood supply to tumour nodules. To compare the effectiveness and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (from 1990 to 30 September 2022). We searched clinical trials registers and contacted investigators of completed and ongoing trials for further information. RCTs comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with standard chemotherapy, other types of anti-cancer treatment, other angiogenesis inhibitors with or without other treatments, or placebo/no treatment in a maintenance setting, in women with EOC.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events (grade 3 and above) and hypertension (grade 2 and above). We identified 50 studies (14,836 participants) for inclusion (including five studies from the previous version of this review): 13 solely in females with newly-diagnosed EOC and 37 in females with recurrent EOC (nine studies in platinum-sensitive EOC; 19 in platinum-resistant EOC; nine with studies with mixed or unclear platinum sensitivity). The main results are presented below.  Newly-diagnosed EOC Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.07; 2 studies, 2776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is very uncertain for PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05; 2 studies, 2746 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the combination results in a slight reduction in global QoL (mean difference (MD) -6.4, 95% CI -8.86 to -3.94; 1 study, 890 participants; high-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26; 1 study, 1485 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 4.27, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.60; 2 studies, 2707 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to block VEGF receptors (VEGF-R), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; 2 studies, 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increase PFS slightly (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00; 2 studies, 2466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination likely reduces QoL slightly (MD -1.86, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.26; 1 study, 1340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but it increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55; 1 study, 188 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 3) (RR 6.49, 95% CI 2.02 to 20.87; 1 study, 1352 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Recurrent EOC (platinum-sensitive) Moderate-certainty evidence from three studies (with 1564 participants) indicates that bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02), but likely improves PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.63) compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination may result in little to no difference in QoL (MD 0.8, 95% CI -2.11 to 3.71; 1 study, 486 participants; low-certainty evidence), but it increases the rate of any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.11, 1.07 to 1.16; 3 studies, 1538 participants; high-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common in arms with bevacizumab (RR 5.82, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.83; 3 studies, 1538 participants).  TKIs with chemotherapy may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; 1 study, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence), likely increase PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; 1 study, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on QoL (MD 6.1, 95% CI -0.96 to 13.16; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common with TKIs (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.10). Recurrent EOC (platinum-resistant) Bevacizumab with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance increases OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 5 studies, 778 participants; high-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.58; 5 studies, 778 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 3.11, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.27; 2 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of bowel fistula/perforation (grade ≥ 2) may be slightly higher with bevacizumab (RR 6.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 55.09; 2 studies, 436 participants). Evidence from eight studies suggest TKIs with chemotherapy likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 940 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with low-certainty evidence that it may increase PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; 940 participants), and may result in little to no meaningful difference in QoL (MD ranged from -0.19 at 6 weeks to -3.40 at 4 months). The combination increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.49; 3 studies, 402 participants; high-certainty evidence). The effect on bowel fistula/perforation rates is uncertain (RR 2.74, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.75; 5 studies, 557 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab likely improves both OS and PFS in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC. In platinum-sensitive relapsed disease, bevacizumab and TKIs probably improve PFS, but may or may not improve OS. The results for TKIs in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC are similar. The effects on OS or PFS in newly-diagnosed EOC are less certain, with a decrease in QoL and increase in adverse events. Overall adverse events and QoL data were more variably reported than were PFS data. There appears to be a role for anti-angiogenesis treatment, but given the additional treatment burden and economic costs of maintenance treatments, benefits and risks of anti-angiogenesis treatments should be carefully considered.

2022-02-11

Randomised phase II trial of weekly ixabepilone ± biweekly bevacizumab for platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer

Abstract Background This multi-center RP2 study assessed activity/safety of ixabepilone + bevacizumab compared to ixabepilone in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Additional objectives were to examine the role of prior bevacizumab and taxanes, and explore class III-ß-tubulin (TUBB3) as a predictive biomarker. Methods Participants were randomised to receive ixabepilone 20 mg/m 2 days 1, 8, 15 with (IXA + BEV) or without (IXA) bevacizumab 10 mg/kg days 1, 15 every 28 days. Patients were stratified by prior BEV. The primary endpoint was PFS. OS, safety, and ORR served as secondary endpoints. Results Among 76 evaluable patients who received IXA + BEV ( n  = 39) compared to IXA ( n  = 37), the ORR was 33% ( n  = 13) versus 8% ( n  = 3)( P  = 0.004), durable at 6 months in 37% ( n  = 14) and 3% ( n  = 1) ( P  &lt; 0.001). BEV significantly improved PFS (median:5.5 vs 2.2 months, HR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.19–0.55, P  &lt; 0.001) and OS (median:10.0 vs 6.0 months, HR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.31–0.87, P  = 0.006). Both regimens were well-tolerated. TUBB3 expression did not predict response. Subgroup analyses revealed minimal effect of prior BEV or taxane resistant/refractory status on response to IXA + BEV. Conclusions IXA + BEV is a well-tolerated, effective combination for platinum/taxane-resistant ovarian cancer that extends PFS and likely OS relative to IXA monotherapy. Prior receipt of BEV should not preclude the use of IXA + BEV. TUBB3 is not a predictive biomarker. Clinical trial registration NCT3093155.

Evaluation of Weekly Ixabepilone With or Without Biweekly Bevacizumab