Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications

NCT02865889CompletedOBSERVATIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Enrollment

343

Start Date

2008-09-01

Completion Date

2013-03-01

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Interventions

Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic IndicationsConventional surgery (abdominal radical surgery)

Conditions

UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMSENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age\>18 years
* Endometrial or cervical cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

\-

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Cost comparison between Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy

The following costs were included:Equipment costs,Instrument costs,Operating room costs,Hospital stay

Time frame: 2 years

Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures (Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy)

Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures will take into account conversion rate, complications rate, metastatic and pelvic relapse

Time frame: 2 years

Locations

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France

Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications