Niraparib Versus Niraparib-bevacizumab Combination in Women With Platinum-sensitive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

NCT02354131CompletedPHASE1, PHASE2INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit

Enrollment

108

Start Date

2015-02-15

Completion Date

2018-11-15

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

Part 1: AVANOVA1 - A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Bevacizumab-niraparib Combination Therapy and Determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) in Women With Platinum-sensitive Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer Part 2: AVANOVA2 - A Two-arm, Open-label, Phase II Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Niraparib Versus Niraparib-bevacizumab Combination in Women With Platinum-sensitive Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer.

Interventions

NiraparibBevacizumab

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

A patient will be eligible for inclusion only if all of the following criteria are fulfilled:

1. Recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer (platinum sensitivity defined as no recurrence within 6 months of last receipt of platinum/chemotherapy).
2. High-grade serious or high-grade endometrioid histology.
3. Patient consents to perform HRD test.

   * Patients with known BRCA status: BRCA positive patients must submit the tissue for HRD test, though these patients need not to wait for HRD test results and can be randomized in HRD positive stratum.
   * If tumor tissue is not sufficient to perform HRD test: these patients shall be randomized in HRD negative stratum as HRD unknown.
4. Prior line of therapy: Patients must have received platinum-containing therapy for primary disease.

   * No limits on number of platinum-based therapies. Population of patients who has previously received ≥ 3 lines of therapy for relapsed disease will be capped at 40%.
   * Up to one non-platinum-based line of therapy in recurrent setting.
   * Patients who are treated with bevacizumab just prior to entering in the trial must not have progressed under or within 3 months after bevacizumab.
   * Patients may have participated in a PARP inhibitor trial as first-line maintenance therapy and have not progressed within 3 months after PARP/placebo. Patients who received PARP inhibitor after relapse (definitive or maintenance therapy) are not eligible.
5. Target group: Age 18+
6. Histological confirmed ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancers
7. Patients must give informed consent
8. Patients may have undergone primary or interval debulking surgery
9. Patients may have received bevacizumab though no other prior use of anti-angiogenic therapy
10. Patients may have received a PARP inhibitor as first-line maintenance therapy.
11. Patients must have disease that is measurable according to RECIST or assessable according to the GCIG criteria
12. The patient agrees to complete PROs (QoL questionnaire) during study treatment AND at one additional time point 8 weeks following progression of disease
13. ECOG performance status 0-2
14. Adequate organ function

    * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,5 x 109/L
    * Platelets \>100 x 109/L
    * Hemoglobin ≥ 9g/dl
    * Serum creatinine ≤1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) or calculated creatinine clearance ≥50mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault formula
    * Total bilirubin ≤1.5x ULN
    * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5x ULN unless liver metastases are present, in which case they must be ≤5x ULN.
15. Able to take oral medications
16. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
17. Patients must fulfill all inclusions criteria and according to investigator fit to receive niraparib and/or bevacizumab.
18. Women of childbearing potential must use adequate birth control for the duration of study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient will not be eligible for inclusion if any of the following criteria are fulfilled:

1. Ovarian sarcomas, small cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, non-epithelial cancers and cancer types not mentioned in the inclusion criteria
2. Concurrent cancer therapy
3. Concurrent treatment with an investigational agent or participation in another clinical trial
4. Major injuries or surgery within the past 21 days prior to start of study treatment with incomplete wound healing and/or planned surgery during the on-treatment study period
5. Previous malignant disease: patients are not eligible for the study if diagnosis, detection or treatment of invasive cancer (other than ovarian cancer; with the exception of basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that was definitively treated) was detected within 2 years prior to randomization
6. Active infections or other serious underlying significant medical illness, abnormal laboratory finding or psychiatric illness/social situation that would, in the Investigator's judgment, makes the patient inappropriate for this study
7. Gastrointestinal disorders or abnormalities that would interfere with absorption of the study drug
8. History of bowel obstruction, including sub-occlusive disease, related to the underlying disease and history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation or intra-abdominal abscess. Evidence of recto-sigmoid involvement by pelvic examination or bowel involvement on CT scan or clinical symptoms of bowel obstruction
9. Known contraindications to PARP inhibitors or VEGF directed therapy
10. Known uncontrolled hypersensitivity to the investigational drugs
11. History of major thromboembolic event defined as:

    * Uncontrolled pulmonary embolism (PE)
    * Deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
    * Other related conditions, though patients with stable therapeutic anticoagulation for more than three months prior randomization are eligible for this study. This also apply to PE \& DVT.
12. History of a cerebral vascular accident, transient ischemic attack or subarachnoid hemorrhage within the past 3 months
13. History of clinically significant hemorrhage in the past 3 months
14. Uncontrolled and/or symptomatic CNS metastasis or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (Dexamethasone/prednisone therapy will be allowed if administered as stable dose for at least one month prior randomization)
15. Significant cardiovascular diseases, including uncontrolled hypertension, clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to randomization, congestive heart failure \> NYHA III, severe peripheral vascular disease, QT prolongation \>470 msec ,clinically significant pericardial effusion
16. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Patients with preserved reproductive capacity, unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the trial and for 3 months afterwards.
17. Radiographic evidence of cavitation or necrotic tumors with invasion of adjacent major blood vessels
18. Active or chronic hepatitis C and/or B infection
19. Persistence of clinically relevant therapy related toxicity from previous chemotherapy
20. Proteinuria as demonstrated by: (a) urine protein: creatinine (UPC) ratio \>/= 1.0 at screening OR (b) urine dipstick for proteinuria \>/=2+ (patients discovered to have \>/=2+ proteinuria on dipstick urinalysis at baseline should undergo a 24 hr urine collection and must demonstrate \</=1g of protein in24 hours to be eligible
21. Patients must not have any known history of MDS
22. Patients must not have known persistent (\> 4 weeks) ≥ Grade 2 hematological toxicity from prior cancer therapy
23. Patients must not have known ≥ Grade 3 thrombocytopenia or anemia with the last chemotherapy regimen.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Progression free survival

This is pick the winer trial. The best arm will be used for phase 3 trial against standard of care.

Time frame: 30 months

Secondary Outcomes

Disease Control Rate

Time frame: 30 months

Locations

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Linked Papers

2023-04-18

Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

Many women, and other females, with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Drugs that inhibit angiogenesis (development of new blood vessels), essential for tumour growth, control cancer growth by denying blood supply to tumour nodules. To compare the effectiveness and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (from 1990 to 30 September 2022). We searched clinical trials registers and contacted investigators of completed and ongoing trials for further information. RCTs comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with standard chemotherapy, other types of anti-cancer treatment, other angiogenesis inhibitors with or without other treatments, or placebo/no treatment in a maintenance setting, in women with EOC.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events (grade 3 and above) and hypertension (grade 2 and above). We identified 50 studies (14,836 participants) for inclusion (including five studies from the previous version of this review): 13 solely in females with newly-diagnosed EOC and 37 in females with recurrent EOC (nine studies in platinum-sensitive EOC; 19 in platinum-resistant EOC; nine with studies with mixed or unclear platinum sensitivity). The main results are presented below.  Newly-diagnosed EOC Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.07; 2 studies, 2776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is very uncertain for PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05; 2 studies, 2746 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the combination results in a slight reduction in global QoL (mean difference (MD) -6.4, 95% CI -8.86 to -3.94; 1 study, 890 participants; high-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26; 1 study, 1485 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 4.27, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.60; 2 studies, 2707 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to block VEGF receptors (VEGF-R), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; 2 studies, 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increase PFS slightly (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00; 2 studies, 2466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination likely reduces QoL slightly (MD -1.86, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.26; 1 study, 1340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but it increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55; 1 study, 188 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 3) (RR 6.49, 95% CI 2.02 to 20.87; 1 study, 1352 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Recurrent EOC (platinum-sensitive) Moderate-certainty evidence from three studies (with 1564 participants) indicates that bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02), but likely improves PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.63) compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination may result in little to no difference in QoL (MD 0.8, 95% CI -2.11 to 3.71; 1 study, 486 participants; low-certainty evidence), but it increases the rate of any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.11, 1.07 to 1.16; 3 studies, 1538 participants; high-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common in arms with bevacizumab (RR 5.82, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.83; 3 studies, 1538 participants).  TKIs with chemotherapy may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; 1 study, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence), likely increase PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; 1 study, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on QoL (MD 6.1, 95% CI -0.96 to 13.16; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common with TKIs (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.10). Recurrent EOC (platinum-resistant) Bevacizumab with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance increases OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 5 studies, 778 participants; high-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.58; 5 studies, 778 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 3.11, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.27; 2 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of bowel fistula/perforation (grade ≥ 2) may be slightly higher with bevacizumab (RR 6.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 55.09; 2 studies, 436 participants). Evidence from eight studies suggest TKIs with chemotherapy likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 940 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with low-certainty evidence that it may increase PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; 940 participants), and may result in little to no meaningful difference in QoL (MD ranged from -0.19 at 6 weeks to -3.40 at 4 months). The combination increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.49; 3 studies, 402 participants; high-certainty evidence). The effect on bowel fistula/perforation rates is uncertain (RR 2.74, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.75; 5 studies, 557 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab likely improves both OS and PFS in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC. In platinum-sensitive relapsed disease, bevacizumab and TKIs probably improve PFS, but may or may not improve OS. The results for TKIs in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC are similar. The effects on OS or PFS in newly-diagnosed EOC are less certain, with a decrease in QoL and increase in adverse events. Overall adverse events and QoL data were more variably reported than were PFS data. There appears to be a role for anti-angiogenesis treatment, but given the additional treatment burden and economic costs of maintenance treatments, benefits and risks of anti-angiogenesis treatments should be carefully considered.

Combining Homologous Recombination-Deficient Testing and Functional RAD51 Analysis Enhances the Prediction of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Sensitivity

PURPOSE To meet the urgent need for accessible homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) test options, we validated a laboratory-developed test (LDT) and a functional RAD51 assay to assess patients with ovarian cancer and predict the clinical benefit of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy. METHODS Optimization of the LDT cutoff and validation on the basis of samples from 91 patients enrolled in the ENGOT-ov24/NSGO-AVANOVA1&amp;2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02354131 ), previously subjected to commercial CDx HRD testing (CDx). RAD51 foci analysis was performed and tumors with ≥five foci/nucleus were classified as RAD51-positive (homologous recombination-proficient). RESULTS The optimal LDT cutoff is 54. Comparing CDx genome instability score and LDT HRD scores show a Spearman's correlation of rho = 0.764 ( P &lt; .0001). Cross-tabulation analysis shows that the sensitivity of the LDT HRD score is 86% and of the LDT HRD status is 91.8% (Fisher's exact test P &lt; .001). Survival analysis on progression-free survival (PFS) of LDT-assessed patients show a Cox regression P &lt; .05. RAD51 assays show a correlation between low RAD51 foci detection (&lt;20% RAD51+ cells) and significantly prolonged PFS ( P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION The robust concordance between the open standard LDT and the CDx, especially the correlation with PFS, warrants future validation and implementation of the open standard LDT for HRD testing in diagnostic settings.