Radical Versus Simple Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection With Low-risk Early Stage Cervical Cancer

NCT01658930CompletedNAINTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Canadian Cancer Trials Group

Enrollment

700

Start Date

2012-12-10

Completion Date

2023-03-11

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection vs Simple Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection in Patients With Low-Risk Early Stage Cervical Cancer (SHAPE)

Interventions

Radical Hysterectomy + pelvic lymph node dissectionSimple hysterectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection

Conditions

Cervical Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, squamous, or adenosquamous cancer of the cervix. Diagnosis has been made by LEEP, cone or cervical biopsy and has been reviewed and confirmed by the local reference gynecological pathologist.
* Patient has been classified as low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. These patients include:

  • FIGO Stage IA2 \[FIGO Annual Report, 2009\], defined as:

  o evidence of disease by microscopy;
* for patients who underwent a LEEP or cone:

  * histologic evidence of depth of stromal invasion \> 3.0 and ≤ 5.0 mm based on the local reference pathologist's measurement of the LEEP or cone specimen NB: the maximum depth of stromal invasion must be ≤ 10 mm.
  * histologic evidence of lateral extension that is ≤ 7.0 mm based on the local reference pathologist's measurement of the LEEP or cone specimen; and
  * negative margins (patients with positive margins are considered IB1, see below)
* for patients who underwent a cervical biopsy only:

  * radiologic evidence of less than 50% stromal invasion based on pelvic MRI

    • FIGO Stage IB1 \[FIGO Annual Report, 2009\] with favorable (low risk) features, defined as:
  * measured stromal invasion and lateral extension that meet the criteria for IA2 (see above) but with positive margins;
  * evidence of disease by clinical exam; lesion must clinically measure ≤ 20 mm
  * evidence of disease by microscopy;
* for patients who underwent a LEEP or cone:

  * histologic evidence of depth of stromal invasion between 5.1-10 mm and/or lateral extension between 7.1-20.0 mm based on the local reference pathologist's measurement of the LEEP or cone specimen
* for patients who underwent a cervical biopsy only:
* radiologic evidence of less than 50% stromal invasion based on pelvic MRI
* lateral extension ≤ 20 mm based on clinical exam or radiologic imaging.

In addition to above criteria on maximal stromal invasion of ≤ 10 mm, the lesion must be no larger than 20 mm in any dimension by any assessment method (MRI, clinical or histological exam). To ensure patients meet this criterion, investigators may need to sum the lesion measurements from biopsy and other methods that evaluate it in the same plane.

Patients are eligible irrespective of the presence or absence of lymph-vascular space involvement (LVSI).

* Physical examination, recto-vaginal examination and visualization of the cervix by speculum or colposcopic examination have been done after the initial diagnostic procedure (LEEP, cone or biopsy) and prior to randomization.
* Chest x-ray or CT scan of chest AND pelvic MRI\* done after initial diagnostic procedure (LEEP, cone or biopsy) and prior to randomization.

The CT should be a 16 slice (or higher) helical scanner. Oral and intravenous contrasts are preferred (unless there is a contraindication to the use of contrast) with scan obtained in the portal phase at a slice thickness of 5mm or lower Pelvic MRI should be performed on a 1.5 or 3 Tesla magnet with pelvic phased-array coils. The MR pulse sequences will consist of T1 gradient echo in the axial plane at 5 mm slice thickness and fast spin echo in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes at 4 mm slice thickness. The short axis (perpendicular to the tumour's long axis) with a 3 mm slice thickness is required in the best plane to show the maximum thickness of stromal invasion. Use of an anti-peristaltic agent is mandatory while intravenous use of gadolinium or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is optional.

\* Note: pelvic MRI is optional if the patient has stage IA2 disease and underwent a LEEP or cone.

* After consideration of a patient's medical history, physical examination and laboratory testing, patients must be suitable candidates for surgery as defined by the attending physician / investigator.
* Patients must have no desire to preserve fertility.
* Patients fluent in English or French must be willing to complete the Quality of Life Questionnaire. The baseline assessments must be completed within 6 weeks prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible. As additional GCIG groups join the study, more translations of some of the questionnaires may be added.

Patients fluent in English or French who reside in Canada and the United Kingdom must agree to participate in the economic evaluation component of this trial and complete the Health Economics Questionnaire. Similarly, patients fluent in English or French accrued from other GCIG groups who are participating in the economic evaluation must be willing to complete the Health Economics Questionnaires.

* Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrolment in the trial to document their willingness to participate.
* Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.
* Surgery is to be done within 20 weeks of initial diagnosis (NO EXCEPTIONS). The 20-week period includes time required for diagnosis, referral, diagnostic staging, randomization and scheduling of the surgical procedure.
* Patients must be ≥ 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with FIGO 1A1 disease \[FIGO Annual Report, 2009\].
* History of other malignancies, except: adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in-situ cancer of the cervix, or other solid tumours, Hodgkin's lymphoma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma curatively treated with no evidence of disease for \> 5 years.
* Patients with evidence of lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging or histology.
* Patients who have had or will receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
* Patients who are pregnant.
* Patients for whom adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy is planned.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Pelvic Recurrence Rate at 3 Years

Pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years was estimated by 1-the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the probability of pelvic relapse free survival (PRFS) at 3 years. PRFS was defined as the time from randomization to the time when a recurrence within the pelvic field was first documented. Patients who had a relapse outside of the pelvic field documented or died before the documentation of a pelvic relapse were censored at the time of first documented extra-pelvic relapse or death. The pelvic relapse free survival of patients who were alive without any relapse at the time of final analysis was censored at the last known alive.

Time frame: 3 years

Secondary Outcomes

Pelvic Relapse-free Survival

It was defined as the time from randomization to the time when a recurrence within the pelvic field was first documented. Patients who had a relapse outside of the pelvic field documented or died before the documentation of a pelvic relapse were censored at the time of first documented extra-pelvic relapse or death. The pelvic relapse free survival of patients who were alive without any relapse at the time of final analysis was censored at the last known alive. 3 year pelvic relapse-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 3 years

Extra-pelvic Relapse-free Survival

It was defined as the time from randomization to the documented reappearance of disease provided that this recurrence is outside of pelvic. Patients who relapsed in pelvic field were censored at the time of first documented pelvic relapse. Patients who died before any relapse or alive without recurrence were censored at the date of death or last known alive date. 3 year extra-pelvic relapse-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 3 years

Relapse-free Survival

It was defined as the time from randomization to the first time when either a pelvic or extra-pelvic recurrence was documented. Patients who died before any recurrence or alive without recurrence were censored at the date of death or last known alive date. 3 year relapse-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 3 years

Overall Survival

It was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. The living patients were censored at the date of last known alive. 3 year overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 3 years

Locations

Barmherzige Brueder Graz, Graz, Austria

Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

LKH Leoben, Leoben, Austria

Landes- Frauen- und Kinderklinik Linz, Linz, Austria

LKH Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

CHR de la Citadelle liege, Liège, Belgium

CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liège, Belgium

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada

Clinical Research Unit at Vancouver Coastal, Vancouver, Canada

CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada

Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Canada

London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada

Trillium Health Partners - Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Canada

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada

University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

Greenfield Park, Canada

CIUSSS de l'Est-de-I'lle-de-Montreal, Montreal, Canada

CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada

The Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Québec, Canada

CIUSSS de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier, Sherbrooke, Canada

Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

CHU Amiens, Amiens, France

Institut Bergonie Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

CHRU de Brest, Brest, France

CHU de Chambery, Chambéry, France

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Centre Jean Perrin - Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Centre Georges Francois Leclerc - Dijon, Dijon, France

CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France

Centre Oscar Lambret - Lille, Lille, France

CHRU de Lille, Lille, France

CHU Limoges, Limoges, France

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

Centre Leon Berard - Lyon, Lyon, France

Institut Paoli Calmettes - Marseille, Marseille, France

Institut Regional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Institut Arnault Tzank - Mougins, Mougins, France

CHU de Nice, Nice, France

CHU de Nimes, Nîmes, France

Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou - Paris, Paris, France

CHU de Reims, Reims, France

CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France

Clinique Mutualiste de la Sagesse - Rennes, Rennes, France

Clinique Mathilde - Rouen, Rouen, France

ICO - Rene Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France

CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

CHU de Bordeaux, Talence, France

Institut Claudius Regaud - Toulouse, Toulouse, France

CHRU de Tours, Tours, France

Hochtaunus-Kliniken gGmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany

DRK Kliniken Berlin Koepenick, Berlin, Germany

DRK Klinikum Berlin Westend, Berlin, Germany

Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany

GYNAEKOLOGICUM Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Kaiserswerther Diakonie - Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany

Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg - Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg-Saar, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Jena, Jena, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Luebeck, Lübeck, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen - LMU Campus Grosshadern, München, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany

Universitaetsfrauenklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Marien-Hospital Witten, Witten, Germany

St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands

Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Hertzen Moscow Scientific Research, Moscow, Russia

Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom

Southend University Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom

East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom

South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom

Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom