Vargatef in Addition to First Line Chemotherapy With Interval Debulking Surgery in Patients With Ovarian Cancer

NCT01583322CompletedPHASE2INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP

Enrollment

188

Start Date

2012-06-01

Completion Date

2015-05-01

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

Randomized Double Blind Placebo-controlled Phase II Trial of Vargatef® (Nintedanib) in Addition to First Line Chemotherapy With Interval Debulking Surgery in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary, the Fallopian Tube or Serous Adenocarcinoma of the Peritoneum

Interventions

vargatefplacebo

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* First diagnosis of histological confirmed (cytology alone excluded) epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Histology should be obtained by laparoscopy (or by laparotomy),
* FIGO-Stages IIIC - IV,
* ECOG performance status \< 2,
* Life expectancy of at least 6 months,
* Primary debulking surgery denied and maximum surgical effort of cytoreduction with the goal of no residual disease planned as interval debulking surgery,
* Interval between diagnosis and enrolment (informed consent) ≤ 8 weeks,
* Adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions:

Platelets \> 100 000 /μL, Hemoglobin \> 9.0 g/dL, Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \> 1500/μL, Prothrombin time and/or partial thromboplastin time \< 50% deviation from normal limits in the absence of therapeutic anticoagulation, Proteinuria \< CTCAE grade 2, Total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT and/or AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN, Glomerular filtration rate \>40 mL/min,

* Females, age 18 years or older,
* Patient has given written informed consent,

Exclusion Criteria:

* Histological diagnosis of malignant tumour of non-epithelial origin (e.g. germ cell tumour, malignant mixed mullerian tumour, sex cord-stromal tumour) of the ovary, the fallopian tube or peritoneum or borderline tumour of the ovary (tumour of low malignant potential),
* Non-healing wound, ulcer (intestinal tract, skin) or bone fracture,
* Clinical symptoms or signs of gastrointestinal obstruction,
* History of major thromboembolic event, defined as:

  * Pulmonary embolism (PE) within 6 months prior to enrolment,
  * Recurrent pulmonary embolism (history of at least 2 events),
* History of at least 2 unprovoked (without a transient or reversible risk factor) events of proximal deep venous thrombosis,
* Prior thrombosis or thromboembolic event in the presence of an inherited coagulopathy (including deficiency of antithrombin, deficiency of protein C or protein S, Factor V Leiden mutation, Prothrombin G20210A mutation),
* Patients with perioperative thrombosis including proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or thrombosis of visceral vessels not associated with pulmonary embolism may be included in the trial if stable therapeutic anticoagulation is documented,
* Known inherited or acquired bleeding disorder,
* Significant cardiovascular diseases, including:

  * Hypertension not controlled by medical therapy,
  * Unstable angina within the past 6 months,
  * History of myocardial infarction within the past 6 months,
  * Congestive heart failure \> NYHA II,
  * Clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia
* Peripheral vascular disease Fontaine stage ≥3,
* Clinically relevant pericardial effusion (e.g. pericardial effusion with echocardiographic or clinical signs of haemodynamic impairment),
* History of a cerebral vascular accident, transient ischemic attack or subarachnoid hemorrhage within the past 6 months,
* Serious infections in particular if requiring systemic antibiotic (antimicrobial, antifungal) or antiviral therapy, including HIV-infection, hepatitis B and/or C infection,
* Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus or other contraindication to high dose corticosteroid therapy,
* Clinical symptoms of brain metastases and/or diagnosis of brain metastases on imaging,
* Pre-existing sensory or motor neuropathy CTCAE ≥ 2, except due to trauma,
* Gastrointestinal disorders or abnormalities that would interfere with absorption of the study drug,
* Other malignancy diagnosed within the past 5 years, except:

  * non-melanomatous skin cancer (if adequately treated),
  * cervical carcinoma in situ (if adequately treated),
  * carcinoma in situ of the breast (if adequately treated),
  * prior or synchronous endometrial cancer (if adequately treated), provided the following criteria are met:

    * Disease stage FIGO ≤ IB,
    * No more than superficial myometrial invasion,
    * Not poorly differentiated (less than grade 3, no papillary serous or clear cell histology),
* Prior systemic therapy for ovarian cancer (e.g. chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, oral targeted therapy, hormonal therapy),
* Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or prior radiotherapy to an extra-abdominal target volume that would bear the risk of increased toxicity of chemotherapy,
* Hypersensitivity to Vargatef® (Nintedanib) and/or the excipients of the trial drugs,
* Serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease such as neurologic, psychiatric or infectious disease, active ulcers (gastrointestinal tract, skin) or a laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study,
* Patients with preserved reproductive capacity who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g. such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices or vasectomized partner) during the trial and for at least twelve months after end of active therapy,
* Pregnancy or breast feeding,
* Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical factors potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule,
* Active alcohol or drug abuse,
* Any contraindications for therapy with paclitaxel or carboplatin, e.g. a history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel or platinum-containing compounds and their excipients, or other drugs formulated with Polyoxyl 35 Castor Oil - ELP,
* Treatment with other investigational drugs or participation in another clinical trial testing a drug within the past four weeks before start of therapy or concomitantly with this trial.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) in each study arm

Time frame: average of 18 months

Secondary Outcomes

Response rate

Time frame: 2 months after beginning of treatment

Locations

Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France

Institut Ste Catherine, Avignon, France

Clinique Tivoli, Bordeaux, France

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord, Bordeaux, France

Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Centre Hospitalier Alpes Leman, Contamine-sur-Arve, France

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France

Centre Hospitalier de Dax, Dax, France

Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France

Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France

Centre Léon bérard, Lyon, France

ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France

Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France

Hôpital Privé du Confluent S.A.S., Nantes, France

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

Centre Hospitalier Régional, Orléans, France

Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France

Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris-Jourdan, Paris, France

Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Pierre-Bénite, France

Milétrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France

Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France

Clinique Armoricaine de Radiologie, Saint-Brieuc, France

Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France

ICO René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France

Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France

Hôpitaux Du Leman, Thonon-les-Bains, France

Centre Claudius Régaud, Toulouse, France

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Linked Papers

2024-12-12

Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA at diagnosis and its early decrease after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. An ancillary analysis of the CHIVA phase II GINECO trial

To evaluate the prognostic impact of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection at diagnosis (T0) and its early decrease after one cycle (T1) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) included in the CHIVA trial (NCT01583322). Blood samples were collected at T0 and before each administration of NACT. Circulating tumor DNA detection was performed by next-generation sequencing. Multivariate analysis was performed. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups defined by ctDNA kinetic profile. Cox survival model was used to search variables associated with PFS and OS. Kaplan-Mayer curve was used to graphically express the differences in PFS and OS. A log-rank test compared the two curves. 188 patients were included. Blood samples were available for 168 patients at T0 and for 160 patients at T0 and T1 to assess ctDNA ratio kinetics. At T0, 107 patients (63.7 %) had detectable ctDNA. At T1, 137 (85.6 %) patients had negative ctDNA or a decrease of more than 80 %. There was a significant benefit in either PFS (p = 0.0017) or OS (p = 0.0036) in favor of early decrease of ctDNA ratio. A favorable decrease was associated with a greater likelihood of being able to perform CRS (OR: 3.94 (CI95 % 1.45-10.70), p = 0.0074). Early decrease of ctDNA ratio can provide prognostic information early in the management of patients, allowing a more accurate information to patients and an early preparation for CRS (prehabilitation).

2023-04-18

Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

Many women, and other females, with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Drugs that inhibit angiogenesis (development of new blood vessels), essential for tumour growth, control cancer growth by denying blood supply to tumour nodules. To compare the effectiveness and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (from 1990 to 30 September 2022). We searched clinical trials registers and contacted investigators of completed and ongoing trials for further information. RCTs comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with standard chemotherapy, other types of anti-cancer treatment, other angiogenesis inhibitors with or without other treatments, or placebo/no treatment in a maintenance setting, in women with EOC.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events (grade 3 and above) and hypertension (grade 2 and above). We identified 50 studies (14,836 participants) for inclusion (including five studies from the previous version of this review): 13 solely in females with newly-diagnosed EOC and 37 in females with recurrent EOC (nine studies in platinum-sensitive EOC; 19 in platinum-resistant EOC; nine with studies with mixed or unclear platinum sensitivity). The main results are presented below.  Newly-diagnosed EOC Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.07; 2 studies, 2776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is very uncertain for PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05; 2 studies, 2746 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the combination results in a slight reduction in global QoL (mean difference (MD) -6.4, 95% CI -8.86 to -3.94; 1 study, 890 participants; high-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26; 1 study, 1485 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 4.27, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.60; 2 studies, 2707 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to block VEGF receptors (VEGF-R), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; 2 studies, 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increase PFS slightly (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00; 2 studies, 2466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination likely reduces QoL slightly (MD -1.86, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.26; 1 study, 1340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but it increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55; 1 study, 188 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 3) (RR 6.49, 95% CI 2.02 to 20.87; 1 study, 1352 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Recurrent EOC (platinum-sensitive) Moderate-certainty evidence from three studies (with 1564 participants) indicates that bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02), but likely improves PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.63) compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination may result in little to no difference in QoL (MD 0.8, 95% CI -2.11 to 3.71; 1 study, 486 participants; low-certainty evidence), but it increases the rate of any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.11, 1.07 to 1.16; 3 studies, 1538 participants; high-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common in arms with bevacizumab (RR 5.82, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.83; 3 studies, 1538 participants).  TKIs with chemotherapy may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; 1 study, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence), likely increase PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; 1 study, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on QoL (MD 6.1, 95% CI -0.96 to 13.16; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common with TKIs (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.10). Recurrent EOC (platinum-resistant) Bevacizumab with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance increases OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 5 studies, 778 participants; high-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.58; 5 studies, 778 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 3.11, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.27; 2 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of bowel fistula/perforation (grade ≥ 2) may be slightly higher with bevacizumab (RR 6.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 55.09; 2 studies, 436 participants). Evidence from eight studies suggest TKIs with chemotherapy likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 940 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with low-certainty evidence that it may increase PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; 940 participants), and may result in little to no meaningful difference in QoL (MD ranged from -0.19 at 6 weeks to -3.40 at 4 months). The combination increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.49; 3 studies, 402 participants; high-certainty evidence). The effect on bowel fistula/perforation rates is uncertain (RR 2.74, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.75; 5 studies, 557 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab likely improves both OS and PFS in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC. In platinum-sensitive relapsed disease, bevacizumab and TKIs probably improve PFS, but may or may not improve OS. The results for TKIs in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC are similar. The effects on OS or PFS in newly-diagnosed EOC are less certain, with a decrease in QoL and increase in adverse events. Overall adverse events and QoL data were more variably reported than were PFS data. There appears to be a role for anti-angiogenesis treatment, but given the additional treatment burden and economic costs of maintenance treatments, benefits and risks of anti-angiogenesis treatments should be carefully considered.

2023-01-25

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Lessons from the GINECO double-blind randomized phase II CHIVA trial

The oral anti-angiogenic therapy nintedanib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with chemotherapy after primary surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The randomized phase II CHIVA trial evaluated the impact of combining nintedanib with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer received 3-4 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel every 3 weeks as NACT before interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by 2-3 post-operative cycles. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either nintedanib 200 mg twice daily or placebo on days 2-21 every 3 weeks during NACT (omitting peri-operative cycles), and then as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was PFS. Between January 2013 and May 2015, 188 patients were randomized (124 to nintedanib, 64 to placebo). PFS was significantly inferior with nintedanib (median 14.4 versus 16.8 months with placebo; hazard ratio 1.50, p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) was also inferior (median 37.7 versus 44.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio 1.54, p = 0.054). Nintedanib was associated with increased toxicity (grade 3/4 adverse events: 92% versus 69%, predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal), lower response rate by RECIST (35% versus 56% before IDS), and lower IDS feasibility (58% versus 77%) versus placebo. Adding nintedanib to chemotherapy and in maintenance as part of NACT for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer cannot be recommended as it increases toxicity and compromises chemotherapy efficacy (IDS, PFS, OS). govregistration: NCT01583322.

2020-11-21

Predicting tumor response and outcome of second-look surgery with 18F-FDG PET/CT: insights from the GINECO CHIVA phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nintedanib in stage IIIc-IV FIGO ovarian cancer

Abstract Background This ancillary study aimed to evaluate 18F-FDG PET parameter changes after one cycle of treatment compared to baseline in patients receiving first-line neoadjuvant anti-angiogenic nintedanib combined to paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus placebo and to evaluate the ability of 18F-FDG PET parameters to predict progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and success of second-look surgery. Materials and methods Central review was performed by two readers blinded to the received treatment and to the patients’ outcome, in consensus, by computing percentage change in PET metrics within a volume of interest encompassing the entire tumor burden. EORTC and PERCIST criteria were applied to classify patients as responders (partial metabolic response and complete metabolic response) or non-responders (stable metabolic disease and progressive metabolic disease). Also analyzed was the percentage change in metabolic active tumor volume (MATV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Results Twenty-four patients were included in this ancillary study: 10 received chemotherapy + placebo and 14 chemotherapy + nintedanib. PERCIST and EORTC criteria showed similar discriminative power in predicting PSF and OS. Variation in MATV/TLG did not predict PFS or OS, and no optimal threshold could be found for MATV/TLG for predicting survival. Complete cytoreductive surgery (no residual disease versus residual disease &lt; 0.25 cm/0.25–2.5 cm/&gt; 2.5 cm) was more frequent in responders versus non-responders (P = 0.002 for PERCIST and P = 0.02 for EORTC criteria). No correlation was observed between the variation of PET data and the variation of CA-125 blood level between baseline sample and that performed contemporary to the interim PET, but a statistically significant correlation was observed between ΔSULpeak and ΔCA-125 between baseline sample and that performed after the second cycle. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET using EORTC or PERCIST criteria appeared to be a useful tool in ovarian cancer trials to analyze early tumor response, and predict second-look surgery outcome and survival. An advantage of PERCIST is the correlation of ΔSULpeak and ΔCA-125, PET response preceding tumor markers response by 1 month. Neither MATV nor TLG was useful in predicting survival. Trial registration NCT01583322 ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP GINECO-OV119, 24 April 2012

2020-07-22

Comparative analysis of predictive values of the kinetics of 11 circulating miRNAs and of CA125 in ovarian cancer during first line treatment (a GINECO study)

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers in ovarian cancer. Their kinetics during treatment might be useful for monitoring disease burden, and guiding treatments in patients treated with peri-operative chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (IDS). Serial blood samples of patients enrolled in the randomized phase II CHIVA trial, comparing first line carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- nintedanib (NCT01583322) and IDS, were investigated to assess the kinetics of 11 relevant miRNAs. Their prognostic/predictive values regarding the likelihood of complete IDS, and the patient survival, were assessed and compared to those of CA125 kinetics. The selection of the miRNAs (miR-15b-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-93-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-200b-3p, miR-148b-5p and miR-34a-5p) was based on the expression levels found with a large explorative panel, and on the literature data. 756 serial blood samples from 119 patients were analyzed for a total of 8172 miRNA assays, and 1299 CA125 values. The longitudinal kinetics of the miRNA expressions were highly inconsistent, and were not related to CA125 dynamics. The miRNA changes during neoadjuvant treatment were not found associated with RECIST tumor response or IDS outcomes. Decreases of miR-34a-5p and miR-93-5p were associated with PFS benefit (p = .009) and OS benefits (p < .001), respectively, using univariate tests. The longitudinal kinetics of miRNA expressions during neoadjuvant treatment in ovarian cancer patients were inconsistent, and were not found to be associated with tumor burden changes. Although some prognostic value could be discussed, no predictive value regarding tumor responses or IDS quality could be identified.

Linked Investigators