Vaccine Therapy in Stage II, III, or IV Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancers

NCT00803569CompletedPHASE1INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

Enrollment

13

Start Date

2008-11-14

Completion Date

2011-01-24

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

Phase I Study of ALVAC(2)-NY-ESO-1(M)/TRICOM (VCP2292) in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma Whose Tumors Express NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1 Antigen

Interventions

ALVAC(2)-NY-ESO-1(M)/TRICOM vaccineSargramostim

Conditions

Fallopian Tube CancerOvarian CancerPeritoneal Cavity Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Histologically documented epithelial carcinoma arising in the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum, from stage II-IV at diagnosis, treated with initial surgery and chemotherapy with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.
2. Complete response to frontline therapy as evidenced by negative clinical examination, CA-125 tumor marker, and computed tomography (CT) scan. In addition, if second look surgery was performed (by laparoscopy or laparotomy), the result must have been either negative or microscopic positive. These patients would have normally entered a period of observation after standard management.
3. Patients with recurrent disease were eligible if they had completed surgery and/or chemotherapy for recurrent disease and would have normally entered a period of observation after completion of standard management. Eligible patients could have had asymptomatic residual measurable disease on physical examination and/or CT scan, and/or could have had an elevated CA-125 or could have been in complete clinical remission (defined as a serum CA-125 ≤ 35 IU/mL, CT scan without objective evidence of disease, and normal physical examination).
4. Tumor expression of 1) NY-ESO-1 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (preferably) or immunohistochemistry (IHC); or 2) LAGE-1 by RT-PCR. Patients whose primary surgery was performed outside the study site were pre-screened and required to release tissue sections or blocks to the study site in order to determine tumor expression of NY-ESO-1 by IHC.
5. Expected survival of at least 6 months.
6. Full recovery from surgery.
7. Karnofsky performance status of 70 or more.
8. Laboratory parameters for vital functions were required to be in the normal range. Laboratory abnormalities that were not clinically significant were generally permitted, except for the following laboratory parameters, which were required to be within the ranges specified:

   * neutrophil count: ≥ 1.5 × 10\^9/L
   * lymphocyte count: ≥ 0.5 × 10\^9/L
   * platelet count: ≥ 100 × 10\^9/L
   * serum creatinine: ≤ 2 mg/dL
   * serum bilirubin (total): ≤ 2 mg/dL
   * hemoglobin: ≥ 10 g/dL
9. Have been informed of other treatment options.
10. Age ≥ 18 years.
11. Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Metastatic disease to the central nervous system for which other therapeutic options, including radiotherapy, may have been available.
2. Other serious illnesses (e.g., serious infections requiring antibiotics, bleeding disorders).
3. History of autoimmune disease (e.g., thyroiditis, lupus) except vitiligo.
4. Other malignancy within 3 years prior to entry into the study, except for treated non-melanoma skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ.
5. Known immunodeficiency or human immunodeficiency virus positivity.
6. Known allergy or history of life-threatening reaction to GM-CSF.
7. Known allergies to eggs, neomycin, and bovine products, determined by history.
8. History of severe allergic reactions to vaccines or unknown allergens.
9. Myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, stroke or transient ischemic attack, chest pain or shortness of breath with activity, or other heart conditions being treated by a doctor.
10. Participation in any other clinical trial involving another investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to first dosing of study agent.
11. Mental impairment that could have compromised the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study.
12. Lack of availability for immunological and clinical follow-up assessment.
13. Previous NY-ESO-1 vaccine therapy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period.

Time frame: Continuously for up to 26 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

Number of Patients With Best Overall Tumor Response

Tumor responses were evaluated using computed tomography and categorized according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.0) at baseline, at Week 12 (± 28 days), and at Week 24 (end of study). Per RECIST, target lesions are categorized as follows: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions \[no evidence of disease\]; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 24

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was calculated from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of documented progression or death, whichever occurred first. Patients without disease progression or death had their observation time censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment. PFS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimators.

Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 24 weeks

Median Cancer Antigen 25 (CA-125) Values on Study

Blood samples were collected for CA-125 testing as a component of disease evaluations at Baseline and Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 (end of study) or every 2 to 3 months on study according to standard institutional practice.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Number of Patients With NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1 Antigen Positivity

Blood samples were collected for measurement of NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1 antigen positivity at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 ,12, 16, 20, and 24 (end of study). Antibody testing was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Locations

Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States

NYU Cancer Institute at New York University Medical Center, New York, United States

Linked Papers

2025-03-25

mTOR inhibition modulates vaccine-induced immune responses to generate memory T cells in patients with solid tumors

Background Perturbation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway can instruct effector versus memory cell fate of tumor antigen-specific T cells in preclinical models. In this study, we sought to understand the impact of rapamycin (sirolimus), an mTOR inhibitor, on reprogramming vaccine-induced T cells to enhance memory responses in patients with solid tumors following completion of their standard therapy. Methods We conducted three phase I clinical trials employing New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) vaccination approaches, with or without schedule-varied rapamycin. T cell phenotypes, functions, and Vβ usage in peripheral blood were analyzed to ask whether rapamycin influenced the generation of vaccine-induced T cells with memory attributes. Results The addition of rapamycin to all vaccination approaches was safe and well tolerated. Immediate (days 1–14 postvaccination) or delayed (days 15–28 postvaccination) administration of rapamycin led to a significant increase in the generation of vaccine-induced NY-ESO-1-specific T cells exhibiting central memory phenotypes (CD45RO+CD45RA− CCR7+). Moreover, delayed administration resulted in a greater than threefold (p=0.025) and eightfold (p=0.005) increase in the frequency of NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells respectively at the time of long-term follow-up, compared with its immediate usage. Conclusion Our novel finding is that delayed administration of rapamycin to patients during the contraction phase of vaccine-induced antitumor immune responses was particularly effective in increasing the frequency of memory T cells up to 1 year postvaccination in patients with solid tumors. Further studies are warranted to identify the impact of this approach on the durability of clinical remission. Trial registration number NCT00803569, NCT01536054, NCT01522820.

Vaccine Therapy in Stage II, III, or IV Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancers